期刊文献+

药师干预前后门诊处方对比分析 被引量:11

Comparative Analysis on Outpatient Prescriptions before and after Intervention by Pharmacists
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨药师对门诊不合理处方的干预效果。方法:以随机抽样法抽取2011年8—12月1 000张处方作为干预前研究资料,按照有关规定对其进行评价,并将结果反馈给临床医师以进行有效干预;以随机抽样法抽取2012年4—7月1 000张处方作为干预后研究资料,按照有关规定进行再次评价,并将结果进行统计分析。结果:经药师干预后,抗菌药物使用率、国家基本药物使用率、药品通用名使用率和处方合理率有显著改善(P<0.01);在不合理处方分类方面,干预后用法与用量不正确、超剂量用药、不合理使用抗菌药物项目较干预前有显著改善(P<0.01)。此外,抗菌药物的分级使用情况在干预后也得到了显著改善(P<0.01)。结论:经药师干预后,门诊处方的大部分指标有显著改善,但仍有部分指标未达到规定要求,还存在不合理用药现象。药师应持续不断地对医师处方实施干预,以规范医师处方行为,最终使门诊处方用药达到安全、有效、经济。 OBJECTIVE:To explore the intervention effect of pharmacists on irrational outpatient prescriptions.METHODS: With a random sampling method,1 000 outpatient prescriptions were selected between August 2011 and December 2011 as research data(pre-intervention) for evaluation in accordance with the relevant criteria,with the results fed back to the clinical physicians so as to achieve effective intervention;another 1000 outpatient prescriptions were randomly sampled between April 2012 and July 2012 and evaluated in accordance with the related criteria with the results analyzed statistically.RESULTS: After intervention by pharmacists as compared with before intervention,the rate of antibiotic use,the rate of essential drug use,the rate of generic name use and rate of rational prescriptions improved significantly(P0.01);regarding the irrational prescriptions,after intervention,the problems such as incorrect usage dosage,overdose and irrational use of antibiotics improved significantly as compared with before intervention(P0.01);moreover,the graded use of antibacterials improved significantly after intervention(P0.01).CONCLUSION: After intervention by pharmacists,most indicators of the outpatient prescriptions have improved significantly;however,some indicators were not up to the standard and irrational use of drug still existed.Therefore,pharmacists should continue to give intervention on prescriptions to regulate physicians' prescribing practices so as to promote safe,effective,economical and rational use of drugs in outpatients.
出处 《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2013年第2期175-177,共3页 Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
关键词 门诊处方 干预 对比分析 Outpatient prescription Intervention Comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1卫生部.处方管理办法[S].卫医发[2007]53号.
  • 2卫生部.医院处方点评管理规范(试行)[s].卫医管发[2010]28号.
  • 3张莉,刘世君,潘菡清.门诊处方点评及不合理处方分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2012,12(5):460-462. 被引量:15
  • 4刘宪军,赵志刚.北京市社区医疗卫生机构实施集中处方点评效果分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2012,12(4):370-372. 被引量:15
  • 5卫生部办公厅.关于继续深入开展全国抗茵药物临床应用专项整治活动的通知[S].卫办医政发[2012]32号.
  • 6李洋,颜虹.处方信息的分析和利用[J].中国医院统计,2005,12(1):79-82. 被引量:228
  • 7卫生部,国家中医药管理局,总后卫生部.抗茵药物临床应用指导原则[S].卫医发[2004]285号.
  • 8卫生部办公厅.关于抗菌药物临床应用管理有关问题的通知[S].卫办医政发[2009]38号.
  • 9谢惠民.合理用药[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:522-522.
  • 10刘丽萍.抗菌药临床合理用药[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:47-60.

二级参考文献47

  • 1唐镜波,陈香谱,谭军,车艳.合理用药调研的国际指标[J].中国药房,1995,6(4):5-7. 被引量:176
  • 2INRUD WHO专家组.合理用药国际网络通讯·中国年鉴[M].唐镜波译.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1998:29.
  • 3卫生部办公厅.关于做好全国抗茵药物临床应用专项整治活动的通知[S].卫办医政发[2011]56号.
  • 4Tomson G. Pilot study of drug use indicators in Sweden [J]. Inrud News,1992,3(1) :3.
  • 5卫生邵.医院处方点评管理规范(试行)[S].卫医暂发[2010]28号.
  • 6Tomson G. Pilot study of drug use indicators in Sweden [J]. Inrud News ,1992,3 ( 1 ) :3.
  • 7WHO. Essential Medicines [ EB/OL ]. 2010-03-02. http :// www. who. int/medicines/areas/rational, use/en/in-dex. html.
  • 8World Health Organization. Promoting Rational Use of Medicines:Core Components, September 2002, Geneva.
  • 9李华祥.医院医师手册[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1991.121.
  • 10L. Simonsen, A. Kane, J. Lloyd, et al, Unsafe injections in the developing world and transmission of bloodborne pathogents: a review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1999,77(10): 789-800.

共引文献342

同被引文献79

引证文献11

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部