期刊文献+

Autonomy, Agency and Identity in Foreign and Second Language Education 被引量:7

Autonomy, Agency and Identity in Foreign and Second Language Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文综述《中国应用语言学》2013 年特刊所探讨的主要理论构念,包括外语和二语教育的自主性(autonomy)、能动性(agency)与身份认同(identity)。我们首先深入探讨和比较自主性和能动性这两个相似概念的复杂意义。自主性的讨论从 Benson (2011) 对自主性的宽阔定义("capacity to take control of one’s own learning")展开,目的在于深入发掘 capacity和 control 各自多层面的涵义以及同时简要解释相关理论及教育实践问题如"可用特性"(affordances)和学习者过程规划(learner agendas)等。在深入审视能动性这一概念的基础上,我们提出自主性和能动性最好被视为相关而相异的两个概念,相异之处在于对教—学过程的有效控制程度。自主性和能动性两个密切相关的概念经过仔细梳理后,我们转向讨论另一个重要相关概念,即外语和二语教育的身份认同。文章最后探讨自主性、能动性和身份认同这些主要概念在语言教育中的相互关系。 This paper reviews key constructs explored in this special issue of Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, including autonomy, agency and identity in foreign/second language education. We first explore and compare, in relatively greater depth, the complex meanings of the two similar concepts of autonomy and agency. In discussing autonomy, we start with an analysis of the meaning of capacity and control in Benson's (2011) broad definition of autonomy as a capacity to take control of one's own learning, and briefly look at related issues of learner agendas and affordances. Based on a close scrutiny of the concept of agency, we propose that autonomy and agency are best treated as distinct concepts in terms of the degree of effective control over the learning-teaching process. Following a dose examination of the two similar concepts of autonomy and agency, we discuss the concept of identity and finally the interrelatedness among these major concepts of autonomy, agency, and identity in language education.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》 2013年第1期6-27,共22页 中国应用语言学(英文)
关键词 语文教育 语言学 自治 机构 外语 BENSON 概念学习 自主权 autonomy agency identity affordances learner agendas
  • 相关文献

参考文献93

  • 1Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137.
  • 2Allison, D., & Huang, J. (2005). Accommodation, resistance, and autonomy: Evidence from Chinese ElZL learning diaries. Paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Applied Linguistics held at University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, 24-29 July 2005.
  • 3Allwright, D. (1988). Autonomy and individualization in whole-class mstrucuon, In. Brookes & P. Grundy (Eds.), Individualization and autonomy in language learning (pp. 35-44). ELT Documents 131. London: Modern English Publications and the British Council.
  • 4Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
  • 5Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • 6Benesch, S. (1993). ESL, ideology, and the politics of pragmatism. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 705-717.
  • 7Benesch, S. (1999). Rights analysis: Studying power relations in an academic setting. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 313-327.
  • 8Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English )or academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 9Benson, E (2007a). Autonomy in language teaching and learning (State-of-the-Art article). Language Teaching, 40 (1), 21-40.
  • 10Benson, E (Ed.) (2007b). Learner autonomy 8: Teacher and learner perspectives. Dublin: Authentik.

同被引文献42

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部