期刊文献+

腰腿痛患者报告结局量表的初步研制 被引量:1

Preliminary Development of Patient Reported Outcome Instrument for Low Back and Leg Pain
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:初步研制腰腿痛患者报告结局量表。方法:通过对前期量表修订、典型病例访谈、核心小组讨论、专家咨询、借鉴国内外相关量表等方法,形成初步量表。于2010年6月-2011年2月间,纳入住院患者100例:男性44例,女性56例;年龄22~65岁,平均51.8岁;腰椎间盘突出症66例,腰椎管狭窄症34例。应用该量表对患者进行测评,并对其进行认知性、信度和效度分析。结果:形成一个由3个域16个条目组成的腰腿痛患者报告结局量表。32例病情无变化患者两次评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且有显著相关性(r>0.9);该量表总体克朗巴赫α系数为0.936;每个条目得分与其所在域得分的相关系数均大于0.5;该量表同Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷表对患者的评分结果具有显著相关性(r>0.9)。结论:该量表有较好的认知性、信度和效度,可尝试作为腰腿痛患者临床疗效的评价工具,但仍需进一步的评价和修订。 Objective:To develop a patient reported outcome instrument for low back and leg pain preliminarily. Methods: The primary instrument was formed by revising early scale, interviewing typical cases, focus group discussion, expert consuiting,referring to related instrument,and etc. 100 inpatients(44 males and 56 females)were analyzed from June 2010 to February 2011. They aged from 22 to 65 years old(mean,51.8 years),including 66 lumbar disc herniation and 34 lumber spinal stenosis. They were tested by the instrument, and then analyzed the cognition, reliability and validity of the scale. Results: A 3-domain, 16-item instrument was developed. For 32 patients with no changes in illness, there was no statistical significant difference between two scores(P)0.05)and it showed significant correlation (r)0.9). The total Cronbachrs Alpha of the instrument was 0. 936. The correlation coefficients of the score of each item and its corresponding domain were more than 0.5. Measurement result of the instrument had significant correlation (r〉0.9)with Oswestry disability index (ODD. Conclusion:The instrument has a good cognition, reliability and validity, which can try to be applied for the therapeutic evaluation of low back and leg pain, but still need further evaluation and modification.
出处 《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 CAS 2013年第4期23-25,28,共4页 Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
关键词 腰腿痛 基于患者报告临床结局 量表 认知性 信度 效度 low back and leg pain patient reported outcome(PRO) instrument cognition reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Qualitt of Life assessment (WHOQOL) devolvement and general psy[ chometric properties [J]. Soe Sei Med, 1998, 46 (12):1569- 1585.
  • 2U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Re- search, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for indus- try:Patient-reported outcome measures:use in medical product de velopment to support labeling claims: draft guidance[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2006,4(10) :79.
  • 3刘保延.患者报告结局的测量:原理、方法与应用[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:295-303.
  • 4NAGATA C,IDO M,SHIMIZU H,et al. Choice of response scale for health measurement: comparison of 4, 5, and 7-point scales and visual analog scale[J]. J Epidemiol,1996,6(4):192-197.
  • 5郑光新,赵晓鸥,刘广林,张利峰.Oswestry功能障碍指数评定腰痛患者的可信性[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(1):13-15. 被引量:558
  • 6刘绍能,刘震,刘慧敏,等.慢性肝病患者自评量表的研制[J].2009,16(9):93-94.
  • 7方积乾.生物医学统计学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007:261-262.
  • 8黄仕荣,石印玉,詹红生.关于腰椎间盘突出症疗效评价客观化的思考与建议[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2007,15(8):55-57. 被引量:8
  • 9VALDERAS J M, FERRER M, MENDIVIL J,et al. Develop ment of EMPROa tool for the standardized assessment o{ patient reported outcome measures [J]. Value in Health, 2008, 11 (4) 700-708.
  • 10THOMAS E N,PERS Y M,MERCIER G,et al. The importance o{ fear, belie{s, catastrophizing and kinesiophobia in chronic low back pain rehabilitation[J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2010, 53 (1) :3-14.

二级参考文献46

共引文献613

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部