摘要
国内学界探讨著作权强制许可制度多从其设立的必要性和建构的可行性入手,脱离了著作权强制许可制度的历史背景,其立论亦难免有所牵强。从《伯尔尼公约》斯德哥尔摩文本、巴黎文本以及随后的《世界版权公约》和《录音制品公约》对著作权强制许可具体实施规则和程序的修订可以看出,著作权强制许可适用越来越严格已成为主要趋势,其背后反映了国际著作权法日益加强著作权人利益保护的现实。同时,从著作权私法属性出发,不宜盲目设立著作权强制许可制度,而应先有效挖掘我国现有著作权的限制与例外制度。
Academics in China mainly discuss the necessity and feasibility of compulsory license in copyright law, which leaves the historical background of it and only thinks about its disadvantages and advantages so as to show a bit of forced analysis. By the analysis of Berne Convention in Stockholm and Paris and World Copyright Treaty and Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms Against Unauthorized Duplication of Their Phonograms, the application area of compulsory licenseas becomes more and more narrow and it reflects the reality that copyright international law protects the intevests of authors. Meanwhile, since copyright is private law, it does not need to es- tablish compulsory license and shall carry out the present exception and limitaitons of copyright law in China now.
出处
《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期80-84,共5页
Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
2010年国家版权局法规司课题(FGBQ201003)