期刊文献+

临床护理路径对改善胃癌患者生活质量的效果 被引量:18

Application and effect of clinical nursing path on the improvement of life quality in gastric cancer patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨临床护理路径对于改善胃癌患者生活质量的效果。方法分析2006年4月至2010年8月解放军总医院收治的胃癌患者临床资料,依据是否实施临床护理路径将其分为临床护理路径组(30例)和普通护理组(30例)。比较两组胃癌患者护理生活质量(QOL)、运动功能及日常生活活动能力(ADL)评分。结果临床护理路径组胃癌患者情绪健康(80.2±15.6)分、总体健康水平(82.2±15.9)分、药物对胃癌患者的影响(83.3±14.1)分、个人认知功能(81.7±15.2)分、社会功能(81.5±14.3)分、对胃癌复发的担忧情况(81.8±16.6)分均优于普通护理组的(65.9±10.4),(63.7±10.0),(66.9±11.2),(66.8±10.9),(67.7±11.8),(67.7±10.9)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为4.18,5.39,4.99,4.36,4.08,3.89;P<0.05),同时临床护理路径组运动功能评分(75.5±9.9)分和ADL评分(73.3±16.1)分均优于普通护理组的(56.4±8.2)分和(53.6±15.0)分,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为8.14,4.90;P<0.05)。结论临床护理路径对于胃癌患者生活质量的效果明显,值得临床借鉴应用。 Objective To study the effect of clinical nursing path on the quality of life of gastric cancer patients. Methods Totals of 60 cases with gastric cancer in Chinese PLA General Hospital between April 2006 and August 2010 were divided into clinical nursing path group (n = 30) and general nursing group (n = 30).And the life quality, motor function and ADL scores were observed. Results The components scores such as emotional health score [ (80.2 ± 15.6)vs (65.9 ± 10.4) ], general health level[ (82.2 ± 15.9) vs (63.7 ± 10.0) ], effects of drugs on gastric cancer patients [ ( 83.3 ± 14. 1 ) vs ( 66.9 ± 11.2 ) ], individual cognitive function[ (81.7 ± 15.2)vs (66.8 ± 10.9) ] ,social function[ (81.5 ± 14.3)vs (67.7 ± 11.8) ] ,the recurrence of gastric cancer anxiety[ (81.8 ± 16.6)vs (67.7 ± 10.9) ] in clinical nursing path group were better than that in general nursing group, and the differences were statistically significant ( t = 4.18,5.39,4.99,4.36,4.08, 3.89 ;P 〈 0.05 ). Meanwhile, the score of motor function and ADL in clinical nursing path group were (75.5 ± 9.9)and (73.3 ± 16. 1 ), which were superior to the score in general nursing group [ (56.4 ± 8.2)and (53.6 ±15.0) ,respectively, t=8.14,4.90;P 〈0. 051. Conclusions The quality of life of gastric cancer patients underwent clinical nursing path are obviously improved, which worthwhile for spreading in clinical practice.
作者 杨慧英 臧莉
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2013年第6期648-650,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 临床护理路径 胃癌 生活质量 Clinical nursing path Gastric cancer Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献80

共引文献497

同被引文献143

  • 1曹伟新.恶性肿瘤患者的营养不良风险和干预[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(5):499-502. 被引量:21
  • 2葛均波,徐永健.内科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:385-390.
  • 3Hyde E, Murphy B. Computerized clinical pathways (care plans) : piloting a strategy to enhance quality patient care [J]. Clin NurseSpec, 2012, 26 (5): 277-282.
  • 4Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Re- view of Interventions VersionS. 1. 0 [EB/OL]. The Co- chrane Collaboration. [2011-03-011. http: //www. Cochrane- hand-book, org.
  • 5王品楠.临床护理路径在胃癌根治术患者中的临床应用[J].中国美容医学,2010,19(2):281-281.
  • 6American Gastroenterological Association(AGA).American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement:Parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology . 2001
  • 7M Yaghoobi,R Bijarchi,S A Narod.Family history and the risk of gastric cancer. British Journal of Cancer . 2010
  • 8Michael J. Cangelosi,Hannah R. Auerbach,Joshua T. Cohen.A clinical and economic evaluation of enteral nutrition. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION . 2011
  • 9赵旭丽,胡竹林,易伟斌,肖丽波,陶涛,李妍.脉络膜上腔引流术治疗难治性青光眼的远期效果[J].眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2008,30(3):200-202. 被引量:8
  • 10陈颖梅,陈俊国.浅谈临床护理路径[J].西北医学教育,2009,17(1):160-162. 被引量:55

引证文献18

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部