摘要
目的观察4种常用的SSRI类抗抑郁药物治疗卒中后抑郁(PsD)的疗效,以及对患者社会功能、生活质量的影响。方法117例卒中后抑郁的住院患者被随机分为4组,分别给予西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、舍曲林、帕罗西汀4种抗抑郁药物治疗,于治疗开始后2,4,8周时分别使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、日常生活能力评估量表(ADL)、生活质量与满意程度量表(Q—LEs—Q—SF)等进行疗效、功能、生活质量等方面的评估。结果随着治疗时间的延长,各组HAMD分数呈下降趋势,而且组内各时间点的评分之间差异均有统计学意义(P均〈O.05);在治疗2周末时,帕罗西汀组HAMD评分与其他3组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);在访视结束时各组间有效率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗前HAMD、HAMA评分与Q—LES—Q—SF评分呈负相关(P〈0.01),访视结束时亦呈负相关(P〈0.01);治疗前HAMA评分与ADL呈正相关(P〈0.01),访视结束时HAMD、HAMA评分与ADI。均呈正相关(P〈0.01)。结论PSD患者抑郁、焦虑程度与日常生活功能呈负相关、与生活质量呈负相关;4种抗抑郁药物治疗PSD患者在治疗8周末时疗效无明显差异,但帕罗西汀起效更快。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of 4 kinds of SSRIs in the treatment of post--stroke depression and their effects on quality of life. Methods Totals of 117 patients with post--stoke depres- sion were enrolled into a randomized controlled trial and were randomly assigned to four groups: citalo- pram, escitalopram, sertraline and paroxetine. All patients were given at least one 8--week treatment with one of the four study drugs. The measure scales, including Hamilton depression scale (HAMD-- 17), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL), Quality of life and life satisfaction questionnaire--short form (Q--LES--Q--SF) were given at before and after treated 2,4,8 weeks. Results HAMD and HAMA scores declined within each group, with statistical significance (P〈 0.05) ; HAMD, HAMA score of the paroxetlne group scores were different (P 〈 0.05) from the other three groups after 2 weeks treatment. Antidepressant efficacy of the four drugs showed no difference (X2 =1.17,P 〉 0.05). HAMD, HAMA scores and the Q--LES--Q--SF scores were negatively correlated before and after the study (P 〈 0.01). Before the study, HAMA and ADL were positively correlated (P 〈0.01), and at the end, HAMD, HAMA, and ADL were positively related (P 〈 0.01). Conclusions Severity of depression showed a negative correlation with physical function and quality of life of the post--stroke depression patients. The four antidepressants have a similar efficacy in 8 week treatment, but paroxetine showed a faster onset of effect. There were no severe adverse effects observed in any of the four groups.
出处
《神经疾病与精神卫生》
2013年第1期16-19,共4页
Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
基金
基金项目:“十一五”国家科技支撑计划(项目编号2009BA77800-课题编号2009BAl77806)