期刊文献+

头脑风暴技术在舞弊审计中的应用

The application of brainstorming in fraud audit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 头脑风暴技术得到了审计职业界的重视,并将其作为一项重要的舞弊风险应对措施加以实施和推广2002年美国审计准则委员会(ASB)修订实施的审计准则(SAS No.99,109)要求审计项目组每次审计都必须执行头脑风暴项目组讨论会,针对客户财务报表可能存在的舞弊行为交换看法,准则制定者认为头脑风暴法作为一种改善审计人员舞弊判断质量的工具,有助于审计人员发现可能存在的舞弊行为。大量的国外审计实践和研究表明,头脑风暴技术在舞弊风险因素识别、舞弊风险评估和舞弊风险应对方面效果都优于审计人员个体判断和决策。 Brainstorming gained attention and importance by the audit profession.It has been implemented and promoted as an important part of fraud risk response.In 2002,the Auditing Standards Board(ASB) in the United States revised the Statement of Auditing Standards(SAS No.99,109) to request every audit team to hold a brainstorming discussion in which auditors exchange views on possible fraud in the client's financial statement.The standards makers regard brainstorming as a tool in improving the judgment quality of auditors in identifying fraud.Extensive overseas audit practices and research suggest that group brainstorming produce more desirable results in identifying, evaluating and responding to fraud risks than the auditors' individual judgment and decision-making.
作者 杨明增
出处 《中国注册会计师》 北大核心 2013年第1期93-95,4,共3页 The Chinese Certified Public Accountant
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(批准号:11YJA790179) 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(批准号:ZR2010GM010)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1杨明增.头脑风暴法在舞弊审计中的运用研究:回顾与启示[J].审计研究,2011(4):94-99. 被引量:11
  • 2Beasley, M., and J. Jenkins. 2003. A primer for brainstorming fraud risks. Journal of Accountancy, 196 (December): 32-38.
  • 3Brazel, J. F. Carpenter, T., and J. G. Jenkins. 2010. Auditors' Use of Brainstorming in the Consideration of Fraud: Reports from the Field. The Accounting Review 85 (4): 1273-1301.
  • 4Hunton, J., and A. Gold. 2010. A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin and open discussion. The Accounting Review 85 (3): 911-935.
  • 5Landis, M., S. I. Jerris, and M. Braswell. 2008. Better brainstorming. Journal of Accountancy 206 (4): 70-73,.
  • 6Ramos, M. 2003. Auditors' responsibility for fraud detection. Journal of Aceountancy,(January): 10-12.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Asare, S., and A. Wright. 2004. The effectiveness of alternative risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (Summer): 325-352.
  • 2Beasley, M., and J. Jenkins. 2003. A primer for brainstorming fraud risks. Journal of Accountancy 196 (December): 32-38.
  • 3Bellovary, J. L., and K. M. Johnstone. 2007. Descriptive evidence from audit practice on SAS No. 99 brainstorming activities. Current Issues in Auditing 1: 1-11.
  • 4Brazel, J. F. Carpenter, T., and J.G. Jenkins. 2010. Auditors' use of brainstorming in the consideration of fraud: reports from the field. The Accounting Review 85 (4): 1273-1301.
  • 5Carpenter, T. 2004. Partner influence, team brainstorming, and fraud risk assessment: some implications of SAS NO. 99. Doctor Dissertation, Florida State University.
  • 6Carpenter, T. 2007. Audit team brainstorming, fraud risk identification, and fraud risk assessment: Implications of SAS No. 99. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1119-1140.
  • 7Hoffman, V. B., and M. F. Zimbelman. 2009. Do strategic reasoning and brainstorming help auditors change their standard audit procedures in response to fraud risk? The Accounting Review 84(3): 811-837.
  • 8Hunton, J., and A. Gold. 2010. A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin and open discussion. The Accounting Review 85 (3): 911-935.
  • 9Landis, M., S. I. Jerris, and M. Braswell. 2008. Better brainstorming. Journal of Accountancy 206 (4): 70-73.
  • 10Lynch, A. L., U. S. Murthy, and T. J. Engle. 2009. Fraud brainstorming using computer- mediated communication: The effects of brainstorming technique and facilitation. The Accounting Review 84 (4):1209-1232.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部