期刊文献+

国产泮托拉唑联合黛力新治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病的临床价值 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察泮托拉唑联合黛力新治疗伴有焦虑、抑郁的非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)的临床疗效。方法选择120例伴有焦虑、抑郁的NERD患者随机分为2组,A组64例,给予泮托拉唑40 mg,早、晚餐前各1次口服,黛力新10.5 mg,早餐后1次口服;B组56例,给予泮托拉唑40 mg,早、中餐前各1次口服,两组疗程均为8周,疗程结束后通过症状记分,判断疗效。结果各组治疗8周后,A组显效率85.9%(55/64),总有效率为95.3%(61/64);B组显效率为35.7%(20/56),总有效率为53.6%(30/56)。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论泮托拉唑联合黛力新治疗伴有抑郁、焦虑的NERD患者疗效显著,值得临床推广应用。
作者 魏国丽 周宇
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2013年第7期47-48,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1徐志洁,段丽萍,王琨,夏志伟,林三仁.焦虑和抑郁与胃食管反流病症状发生的相关研究[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(45):3210-3215. 被引量:96
  • 2刘洋,龚均,董蕾,王学勤,朱有玲.非糜烂性反流病的临床研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2005,36(4):552-554. 被引量:18
  • 3Simon B, Muller P, Paseu O, et al. Intra-oesophageal pH profiles and pharmacokinetics of pantopra -zole and esomeprazole : a cross- over study in patients with gastro- oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepato1,2003,15 : 791-799.
  • 4Glatzel D, Ahdel-Qader M, Gatz G, et al. Pantoprazole 40 mg is as effective as esomeprazole 40 mg to relieve symptoms of gastroesoph- ageal reflux disease after 4 weeks of treatment and superior regard- ing the prevention of symptomatic relapse. Digestion, 2006,74 : 145-154.
  • 5Fass R. Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) : comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeu- tic characteristics. J Clin Gastroneterol, 2007,411131-137.
  • 6Heading RC, M? nnikes H, Tholen A, et al. Prediction of response to PPI therapy and factors influencing treatment outcome in patients with GORD: a prospective pragmatic trial using pantoprazole. BMC Gastreenterelogy,2011, 11:52.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Fass R. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol, 2003, 98(Suppl 3): S2-7.
  • 2Dent J, Brun J, Frendrick AM, et al. An evidence- based appraisal of reflux disease management-the Genval workshop report. Gut, 1999,44(Suppl 2):S1-S16.
  • 3Martinez SD, Malagon LB, Garewal HS, et al. Non-erosive reflux disease(NERD)-acid reflux and symptom pattern. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2003,17:537-545.
  • 4Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut, 1999, 45:172-180.
  • 5Fass R,Tougas G. Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain. Gut, 2002,51:885-895.
  • 6Pace F, Bollani S, Molteni P, et al. Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD)--a reappraisal 10 years on. Dig Liver Dis, 2004,36:111-115.
  • 7Pace F, Porro GB. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: a typical spectrum disease (a new conceptual framework is not needed). Am J Gastroenterol, 2004,99:946-949.
  • 8Peghini PL, Katz PO, Bracyna NA, et al. Nocturnal recovery of gastric acid secretion with twice-daily dosing of proton pump inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol, 1998, 93: 763-767.
  • 9Lind T, Harelund T, Carlsson R, et al. Heartburn without esophagitis: efficacy of omeprazole therapy and features determining therapeutic response. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1997,32:974-979.
  • 10Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorder and the RomeII process. Gut,1999,45(Suppl II):II1-II5.

共引文献106

同被引文献78

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部