期刊文献+

DNA条形码理论与新生物学本质主义 被引量:1

The Bar Code Theory of DNA and New Biological Essentialism
原文传递
导出
摘要 "物种"是否存在本质,这一直是个争论不休的问题。DNA条形码理论代表了一种新的生物学本质主义主张。它把DNA条形码视为物种的"专名",在生物学中发展了一种克里普克意义上的本质主义。但是,作者认为,DNA条形码理论不能回答被视为本质主义核心内容的物种"特征"问题。所以,该理论只能被视为一种不成功的生物学本质主义辩护方案。其失败的根本原因在于克里普克的本质主义并不适用于生物学。 Do species have the essences? This is a question which has always been debated by the philosophers. The bar code theory of DNA represents a new biological essentialism. The bar code of DNA is regarded as the species "proper name". This theory develops a Kripke's version of essentialism in the biology. However, it can' t answer "the trait question" of spedes wldch is considered to be a core feature of essentialism by many philosophers. So, the bar code of DNA is an unsuccessful justification about the biological essentialism. It failure fundamentally due to that Kripke' s essenlism is not applicable to the biology.
作者 李胜辉
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期9-13,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 本质主义 DNA条形码 “特征”问题 内部构造 essentialism the bar code of DNA the trait question internal structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[美]恩斯特·迈尔.生物学思想发展的历史[M].涂长晟等译.成都:四川教育出版社,2010年.
  • 2David L. Hull. The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis (I) [J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Sci- ence, 1965(15): 314-326.
  • 3Hilary Putnam. Is Semantics Possible? [A]// Hi- lary Putnam. Mind, Language and Reality: Philo-sophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge U- niversity Press, 1975.
  • 4Paul. D. N. Hebert, T. Ryan. Gregory. The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonomy[J]. Systematic Bi- ology, 2005(54): 852-859.
  • 5Alice Valentini, Francois Pompanon and Pierre Taberlet. DNA Barcoding for Ecologists[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2008(28): 110-117.
  • 6Olivier Rieppel. New Essentialism in Biology[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2010(77):662-673.
  • 7[美]索尔·克里普克.命名与必然性[M].梅文译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005.
  • 8Marc Ereshefsky. Species [EB/OL]. http://plato. stanford, edu/archives/spr2010/ entries/ species/.
  • 9Marc Ereshefsky. What's Wrong with the New Bio- logical Essentialism [J]. Philosophy of Science, 2010(77):674-685.

共引文献3

同被引文献34

  • 1华凌,2015,《基因组图谱全面揭秘鸟类演化"大爆炸"历程》,载于《科技日报》2015年5月2日第2版.
  • 2Boyd, R. , 1999, " Homeostasis, Species and Higher Taxa", in Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Robert A. Wilson, eds, The MIT Press.
  • 3DeSalle, R. O. B. , 2006, "Species Discovery Versus Species Identification in DNA Barcoding Efforts: Response to Rubinoff", in Conservation Biology, vol. 20, no. 5, 2006.
  • 4Devitt, M., 2008, "Resurrecting Biological Essentialism", in Philosophy of Science, vol. 75, no. 3, 2008.
  • 5Dove, C.J., Rotzel, N.C., Heacker, M., et al., 2008, " Using DNA Barcodes to Identify Bird Species Involved in Birdstrikes", in The Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 72, no. 5, 2008.
  • 6Dumsday, T. , 2012, "A New Argument for Intrinsic Biological Essentialism", in The Phlosophical Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 248, 2012.
  • 7Dupre, J. , 1981, "Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa", in The Philosophical Review, vol. 90, no. 1, 1981.
  • 8Elder, C. , 2004, Real Natures and Familiar Objects, MIT Press.
  • 9Elder, C. , 2008, " Biological Species are Natural Kinds ", in Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 46, no. 46, 2008.
  • 10Hacking, I., 2007, " Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight", in Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, vol. 61, no. 1, 2007.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部