期刊文献+

“金砖国家”引进FDI的溢出效应:技术差距抑或研发能力 被引量:2

The Spillover Effects on FDI in BRICS:Technology Gap or R & D Capabilities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用2001~2010年相关数据,对"金砖国家"引进FDI的技术溢出效应进行实证检验的结果表明:"金砖国家"的吸收能力是决定其引进FDI技术溢出效应的关键变量;在考虑吸收能力这一因素的条件下,中国和印度引进FDI的技术溢出效应较大,俄罗斯次之,巴西和南非较小;"金砖国家"引进的技术溢出效应差异主要与技术差距、跨国公司研发中心分布有关。 Using the related data from 2001 to 2010, this paper makes Empirical test on the technology spillover effect on FDI in BRICS and comes to conclusions below. BRICS's absorptive capability is the determinant of technology spillover. In consideration of absorptive capability, China and India have greater spillover effect, then Russia, and finally comes Brazil and South Africa. This paper points out that technology spillover effect on FDI in BRICS is mainly influenced by the technology gap and distribution of Foreign-affiliate R&D centres.
作者 鲍洋
出处 《改革》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期98-104,共7页 Reform
基金 教育部人文社会科学一般项目"东道国区位优势与FDI流入关系研究"(批准号:11YJAGJW010) 教育部人文社会科学一般项目"FDI技术水平与东北地区贸易结构关系研究"(批准号:10YJC790412) 教育部人文社会科学一般项目"中国企业对外直接投资的发展路径及其决定因素研究:基于东道国与母国双力视角"(批准号:12YJC790295) 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"东北地区FDI质量与贸易结构研究"(批准号:L10DJL048)
关键词 金砖国家 FDI 跨国公司 经济全球化 BRICS FDI multinational corporation economic globalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Bonelli, R. A Note ment and Industrial on Foreign Direct Invest- Competitiveness in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro, IPEA, Texto Para Discussao, 1998, (584).
  • 2Moreira, M. M. Estrangeiros em uma Economia Aberta: Impactos Recentes Sobre Produtividade, Concentracao Ecomercio Exterior. 1999, (67), NDES/Depec.
  • 3Goncalves, J. E. P. Empresas Estrangeiras e Transbordamentos de Produtividade na Industria Brasileira: 1997-2000. Dissertacao de Mestrado. IE-Unieamp, Campinas, Brasil. 2003.
  • 4Costa, I., Queiroz, S. R. R. FDI and Technological Capabilities the Brazilian Industry. Research Policy, 2001, 31(8-9), pp.1431-1443.
  • 5Hiratuka, C. Foreign Direct Investment and Transnational Corporations in Brazil: Recent Trends and Impacts on Economic Development. Working Group on Development and Environment in the Americas, Discussion Paper, 2008, (10).
  • 6Nassif, A. National Innovation System and Macroeconomic Policies: Brazil and India in Comparative Perspective. UNCTAD Discussion Paper, 2007, (184).
  • 7Bessonova, E., Kozlov, K., Yudaeva, K. Trade Liberalization, Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity of Russian Firms, CEFIR Working Paper, 2002.
  • 8Yudaeva, K., Kozlov, K., Melentieva, N., Ponomareva, N. Does Foreign Ownership Matter? Russian 2003, 1 Experience. Economics of Transition, 1(3), pp.383-409.
  • 9Bhattacharya, M., Chen, J.R., Pradeep, V. Productivity Spillover in Indian Manufacturing Firms. 2008, Discussion Paper, 30/08, Monash University: Business and Economics, Australia.
  • 10Sasidharan, S. Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillovers: Evidence from the Indian Manufacturing Sector. UNU-Merit Working Paper Series, 2006, (10).

二级参考文献95

共引文献416

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部