期刊文献+

昏迷患者脑电图反应性对预后的预测价值 被引量:11

Prognostic predictive value of EEG reactivity in comatose patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨脑电图(EEG)的反应性对昏迷患者预后的预测价值。方法:52例昏迷患者行床边动态EEG记录,判定刺激后EEG反应性。根据Synek分级(1988)将EEG类型进行预后分类。观察终点为患者发病3个月后存活情况。对患者EEG反应性及相关临床数据特点与预后结果进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。结果:在EEG记录中,有反应者生存率为90%。无反应者生存率28.6%。在Synek分级为预后不确定的患者中,EEG有反应者12例,生存率为92%;无反应性的6例,生存率为33%。单因素分析结果示格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、Synek分级和EEG反应性与预后有关(均P〈O.01)。EEG反应性对判定预后的敏感性为83%,特异性为82%。多因素logistic回归分析显示,入院时EEG反应性EOR=0.019,95%CI(0.001,0.291)]、GCS评分及Synek分级与预后显著相关。结论:EEG反应性对昏迷患者具有很好的预测价值。 Objective: To study the prognostic predictive value of EEG reactivity in comatose pa- tients. Methods: EEG was dynamically recorded at bedside in 52 comatose patients EEG reaction to stim- uli. EEG was classified according to Synek classification (1988). The prognosis(death or survival)was e- valuated at 3 months after the onset. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed on EEG reactivity and clinical data of prognosis. Results.. In patients with reactivity, 900//00 of them survived, while in patients without reaction,29% survived. EEG reactivitis were detected in 67% of patients classified ' uncertain' and 92 % of them survived at 3 months after the onset. Univariate anal- ysis showed the EEG reactivity, GCS score and Synek classification were correlated significantly with prognosis(all P〈0.01). The rate of sensitivity and specificity of EEG reactivity were 83% and 82% re- spectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the EEG reactivity [-OR= 0. 019, 95 % CI(0. 001,0.291) ], GCS score and Synek classification were correlated significantly with prognosis. Conclusion: EEG reactivity is an excellent outcome predictor in comatose patients.
出处 《癫痫与神经电生理学杂志》 2013年第2期79-82,共4页 Journal of Epileptology and Electroneurophysiology(China)
关键词 EEG反应性 Synek分级 昏迷 EEG reactivity Synek scale Coma
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired con- sciousness. A practical scale[J]. Lancet, 1974,2 : 281-284.
  • 2Synek VM. Prognostically important EEG coma patterns in diffuse anoxic and traumatic encephalopathies in adults[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 1988,5:161-174.
  • 3Gutling E, Gonser A, Imhof HG, et al. EEG reactivity in the prognosis of severe head injury [J]. Neurology, 1995,45 : 915- 918.
  • 4Fishgold H, Dreyfus BA. Complementary examinations in the follow-up of bodily injury[J]. Maroc Med, 1971,51:593-595.
  • 5Young GB. The EEG in coma[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol,2000, 17:473-485.
  • 6Moruzzi G, Magoun HW. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG[J]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophys- iol, 1949,1 : 455-473.
  • 7Rothstein TL, Thomas EM, Sumi SM. Predicting outcome in hypoxic-ischemic coma. A prospective clinical and electrophys- iologic study[J]. Electroeneephalogr Clin Neurophysiol,1991, 79:101-107.
  • 8Young GB, Kreeft JH, McLachlan RS, et al. EEG and clinical associations with mortality in comatose patients in a genera), in- tensive care unit[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 1999,16:354-360.
  • 9Kassab MY, Farooq MU, Diaz-Arrastia R,et al. The clinical significance of EEG cyclic alternating pattern during coma [J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2007,24 : 425-428.
  • 10Geocadin RG, Ghodadra R, Kimura T, et al. A novel quanti- tative EEG injury measure of global cerebral ischemia[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2000,111 : 1779-1787.

同被引文献75

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部