期刊文献+

小切口钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折两种置钉方式疗效比较 被引量:5

Comparison of clustered screw insertion and separated screw insertion of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in treatment of midshaft tibia fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创钢板固定法(MIPO)治疗胫骨骨折中连续置钉与间隔置钉两种固定方式的临床疗效并进行对比。方法采用MIPO技术治疗46例胫骨中段骨折,连续置钉组22例,间隔置钉组24例。术后24h内均不负重状态下功能锻炼。对比分析两组手术时间、术中出血量、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间及术后Johner-Wruhs评分以及内固定断裂发生率。结果所有患者均获得平均14.8(12-24)个月随访。两组手术时间、术中出血量及末次随访Johner-Wruhs评分的差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。连续置钉组骨折愈合时间与完全负重时间较间隔置钉组延长,内固定断裂发生率更高。结论采用MIPO技术治疗胫骨干骨折时,间隔置钉的固定方法可避免应力过于集中,降低内固定断裂的风险,有利于加快骨折愈合,能使患者早期负重。 Objective To evaluate and compare the clinical effects of clustered screw insertion with separated screw insertion of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the treatment of midshaft tibia fractures. Methods A retrospective study with more than 12 months follow-up of 46 patients with midshaft tibia fractures who underwent MIPO was carried out, including 22 with clustered screw insertion and 24 patients with separated. Operation duration and volume of blood loss were assessed in the two groups, respectively. At the final follow-up, full weight bearing time, fracture healing time, final functional results evaluated according to Johner-Wruhs methods and occurring rate of implantation breakage of each group were statistically analyzed, respectively. Results The average follow-up period was 14.8 months (range, 12-24). There were no significant differences between cluster group and separate group for the average operating time, the average volume of intraoperative bleeding and the excellent-good rate of Johner-Wruhs score (P 〉0.05). The fracture healing time and full weight-bearing time in the cluster group were longer than the separate group. The rate of plate and screw broken in the cluster group was higher than the separate group. Conclusion MIPO using locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of midshaft tibia fracture,the separated screw insertion could beneficially disperse stress upon the implantation and promote fracture healing. The fracture treated by LCP with separated screws allows earlier weight bearing.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2013年第4期330-332,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 胫骨骨折 微创钢板固定法 内固定 螺钉分布 Tibia fracture Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis Internal fixation Screw distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献32

  • 1谢培庆,王宗篪,庄国铭,黄庆杰,赖森财,黄跃.牙颌组织CT图像处理技术研究[J].三明高等专科学校学报,2004,21(2):41-46. 被引量:3
  • 2戈涛,徐中和,邝炯祥,侯之启.MIPPO技术下运用LCP治疗胫骨远端骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(8):619-621. 被引量:42
  • 3乔荣勤,魏合伟,蔡桦.解剖型锁定加压接骨板微创治疗Pilon骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(9):742-743. 被引量:21
  • 4谢学然,张毅,陈春冉.经皮锁定加压钢板内固定治疗胫腓骨骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(2):139-140. 被引量:6
  • 5荣国威 翟桂华.骨科内固定(第3版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.86-87.
  • 6Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury, 2003, 34 (2): 31
  • 7刘黎军,肖建德.钢板内固定.见:肖建德,王大平主编.临床骨科新理论和新技术.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2003.453-455
  • 8Belytschko T, Andriaeehi TP, Schultz AB, et al. Analog studies of forces in the human spine computational techniques. J Biomeeh, 1973, 6:361
  • 9MeKibbin B. The biology of fraeture healing in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1978, 60:150
  • 10Ruidi TP,Murphy WM,王满宜,杨庆铭,曾炳芳译.骨折治疗的AO原则.北京:华夏出版社.2003.1-28.

共引文献80

同被引文献34

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部