期刊文献+

Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram 被引量:1

Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The Gaussian mixture model (GMM), k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to classify wrist motions using surface electromyogram (EMG). Effect of feature selection in EMG signal processing was also verified by comparing classification accuracy of each feature, and the enhancement of classification accuracy by normalization was confirmed. EMG signals were acquired from two electrodes placed on the forearm of twenty eight healthy subjects and used for recognition of wrist motion. Features were extracted from the obtained EMG signals in the time domain and were applied to classification methods. The difference absolute mean value (DAMV), difference absolute standard deviation value (DASDV), mean absolute value (MAV), root mean square (RMS) were used for composing 16 double features which were combined of two channels. In the classification methods, the highest accuracy of classification showed in the GMM. The most effective combination of classification method and double feature was (MAV, DAMV) of GMM and its classification accuracy was 96.85%. The results of normalization were better than those of non-normalization in GMM, k-NN, and LDA. The Gaussian mixture model (GMM), k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to classify wrist motions using surface electromyogram (EMG). Effect of feature selection in EMG signal processing was also verified by comparing classification accuracy of each feature, and the enhancement of classification accuracy by normalization was confirmed. EMG signals were acquired from two electrodes placed on the forearm of twenty eight healthy subjects and used for recognition of wrist motion. Features were extracted from the obtained EMG signals in the time domain and were applied to classification methods. The difference absolute mean value (DAMV), difference absolute standard deviation value (DASDV), mean absolute value (MAV), root mean square (RMS) were used for composing 16 double features which were combined of two channels. In the classification methods, the highest accuracy of classification showed in the GMM. The most effective combination of classification method and double feature was (MAV, DAMV) of GMM and its classification accuracy was 96.85%. The results of normalization were better than those of non-normalization in GMM, k-NN, and LDA.
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2013年第4期960-968,共9页 中南大学学报(英文版)
基金 Project(NIPA-2012-H0401-12-1007) supported by the MKE(The Ministry of Knowledge Economy), Korea, supervised by the NIPA Project(2010-0020163) supported by Key Research Institute Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea
关键词 表面肌电图 分类方法 运动 手腕 线性判别分析 高斯混合模型 K-NN 信号处理 Gaussian mixture model k-nearest neighbor quadratic discriminant analysis linear discriminant analysis electromyogram (EMG) pattern classification feature extraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1YOU K J, SHIN H C. Classifying finger flexing motions with surface EMG using entropy and the maximum likelihood method [J]. The Institute of Electronics Engineers of Korea, 2009, 46(6): 38-43.
  • 2CASTELLINI C, SMAGT P. Surface EMG in advanced hand prosthetics [J]. Biological Cybernetics, 2009, 100(1): 35-47.
  • 3JANG Y G, KWON J W, HAN Y H, JANG W S, HONG S H. A study of the pattern classification of the EMG signals using neural network and probabilistic model [J]. The Institute of Electronics Engineers of Korea, 1991, 28(10): 831-841.
  • 4AHMAD S A, CHAPPELL P H. Surface EMG pattern analysis of the wrist muscles at different speeds of contraction [J]. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 2009, 33(5): 376-385.
  • 5FARRY K A, WALKER I D, BARANIUK R. G. Myoelectric teleoperation of a complex robotic hand [J]. IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, 1996, 12(5): 775-788.
  • 6ENGLEHART K, HUDGINS B, CHAN A D C. Continuous multifunction myoelectric control using pattern recognition [J].Technology and Disability, 2003, 15(2): 95-103.
  • 7PELEG D, BRAIMAN E, ELAD Y T, 1NBAR G F. Classification of finger activation for use in a robotic prosthesis arm [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2002, 10(4): 290-293.
  • 8CHAN A D C, ENGLEHART K B, Continuous classification of myoelectric signals for powered prostheses using Gaussian mixture models [C]// Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. Cancun, 2003: 17-21.
  • 9BAKER J J, SCHEME E, ENGLEHART K. Continuous detection and decoding of dexterous finger flexions with implantable MyoElectric sensors [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2010, 18(4): 424-432.
  • 10CHAN F H Y, YANG Y S, LAM F K, ZHANG Y T, PARKER P A. Fuzzy EMG classification for prosthesis control [J]. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 2000, 8(3): 305-311.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部