期刊文献+

中国社会利率实证研究:以人身损害赔偿为例

下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会利率已成为协调经济增长与环境保护的重要工具,对可持续发展具有重要贡献。在社会利率的演化进程中,理论研究、规制决策以及实践应用都显示出对其取值的重要影响,目前,法律正成为新的影响因素。与社会利率相关的法律主要集中在侵权责任领域,人身损害赔偿是其中的一项重要内容。基于人身损害赔偿的实证研究发现:在中国,当只考虑个人收入时,社会利率是10.50%,优化值是8.54%;当考虑整个家庭的收入时,社会利率是8.67%,优化值是6.22%。这个结果表明,目前中国法律所确定的社会利率为8%~10%,如果对立法进行微调或对司法进行加强,则可以使社会利率下降到6%~8%。虽然两种取值都高于目前国内外普遍选用的社会利率,但后一种对经济增长与环境保护的协调力相对更强,更能促进中国的可持续发展。
作者 边琳
出处 《江西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期108-120,共13页 Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Hausman, J. A: Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10(1): 33-54.
  • 2Moore Michael J., Viscusi W. Kip. Models for Estimating Discount Rates for Long-term Health Risks Using Labor Market Data[j]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1990, 3(4): 381-401.
  • 3Viscusi W. K., M. J. Moore. Rates of Time Preference and Valuations of the Duration of Life[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1989, 38(3): 297-317.
  • 4Stockfisch J. A: Measuring the Social Rate of Return on Private Investment[A]. in Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy[C]. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.
  • 5Horowitz J. K., R. T. Carson. Discounting Statistical Lives[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1990, 3(4): 403-413.
  • 6Hammitt James K., Liu Jin-Tan. Effects of Disease Type and Latency on the Value of Mortality Risk[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2004, 28(1): 73-95.
  • 7Weitzman Martin L: Gamma Discounting[J]. The American Economic Review, 2001, 91(1): 260-271.
  • 8张颖,任若恩,黄薇.中国代际内与代际间贴现率的实验研究[J].金融研究,2008(9):164-175. 被引量:23
  • 9谭运嘉,李大伟,王芬.中国分区域社会折现率的理论、方法基础与测算[J].工业技术经济,2009,28(5):66-69. 被引量:19
  • 10Morrison Edward R: Judicial Review of Discount Rates Used in Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis[J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 1998, 65(4): 1333-1369.

二级参考文献35

  • 1曹诗权,李政辉.论侵害生命权在民法上的责任[J].法学评论,1998,16(5):68-73. 被引量:23
  • 2龚六堂.贴现因子、偏好和行为经济学[J].财经问题研究,2004(8):3-9. 被引量:21
  • 3Arrow, K. J. , Cline, W. R. , Maler, K. -G. , Munasinghe, M. , Squitieri, R. , and Stiglitz, J. D. , 1996, "Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency", in Bruce, J. P. , Lee, H. , and Haites, E. F. (eds.), Climate Change 1995 - Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, UK Cambridge : Cambridge University Press: 125 - 144.
  • 4Baron, J. , 2001, "Can We Use Human Judgments to Determine the Discount Rate?", Risk Artalsysis, Vol. 20 : 861 - 868.
  • 5Benzion, U. , Rapoport, A. , and Yagil, J. , 1989, “Discount Rates Inferred from Decisions: An Experimental Study”, Management Science, Vol. 35 : 270 - 284.
  • 6Chen, L , Ding L , 2007, "A Study on Social Assessment in Construction Project of China", Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCom 2007) : 5491 -5494.
  • 7Cropper, M. L , Aydede, S. K. , and Portney, P. R. , 1991, "Discounting Human Lives". American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 73 : 469 -472.
  • 8Cropper, M. L. , Aydede, S. K. , and Portney, P. R. , 1992, "Rates of Time Preference for Saving Lives", American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 82:469 -472.
  • 9Cropper, M. L , Aydede, S. K. , and Portney, P. R. , 1994, “Preferences for Live Saving Programs: How the Public Discounts Time and Age”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 8:243 -265.
  • 10Chapman, G. B. , 2000, "Preferences for Improving And Declining Sequences of Health Outcomes", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 13:203 -18.

共引文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部