摘要
通过对《濠梁之辩》的逻辑分析,可以看出庄子无论是论证自己的观点还是反驳惠子的诡辩都是有理有据、符合逻辑,显示出中国在先秦时代,逻辑技巧已发展到相当成熟的程度。
It can be seen that Chuang-tzu is reasonable and logical in both proving his point of view or refuting Keiko’sophistry through the logical analysis of the Ho Leung Debate.Logical skills have been developed to a very mature degree in China’s pre-Qin era.
关键词
《濠梁之辩》
推理
诡辩
The Ho Leung Debate
Reasoning
Sophism
