期刊文献+

旧证据问题的反事实概率分析

From the Analysis of the Counterfactual Probability to the Problem of Old Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旧证据问题表明,旧证据在贝叶斯主义框架内不能确证任何理论或假说。这使得贝叶斯主义的合理性遭到了质疑。贝叶斯主义者对旧证据问题提供了多种可能解法。反事实概率的引入讨论便是其中一种。豪森Colin Howson认为反事实概率具备有效性,并且存在评估反事实概率的一般法则,最终提出了一个贝叶斯式的旧证据解决方案。 The problem of old evidence shows that theories and hypotheses aren' t confirmed in the field of Bayesian reasoning. This makes the rationality of Bayesian is in question. Many solutions to the problem of old evidence are proposed by Bayesian. One of the solutions is the analysis of counterfactual probability. From the view of Howson, the counterfactual probability is provided with validity. The computing method and the Bayesian approach of the counterfactual probability are come up.
作者 黄闪闪
机构地区 南开大学哲学院
出处 《毕节学院学报(综合版)》 2013年第2期49-53,共5页 Journal of Bijie University
关键词 旧证据问题 反事实概率 贝叶斯解决方案 The Problem of Old Evidence The Counterfactual Probability The Bayesian Approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Glymour,C. Theory and Evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.
  • 2Earman, J. Bayes or bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Comfrmation Theory[M].Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press, 1992:135.
  • 3任晓明,黄闪闪.贝叶斯推理的逻辑与认知问题[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,42(4):106-113. 被引量:11
  • 4Colin Howson, Error Probabilies in Error[]].Philosophy of Science, 2011, (64): 191.
  • 5Mayo, D. Error ancl the Growth of Experimental Knowledge[M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1996:334.
  • 6马文俊,熊卫.旧证据问题:一种动态的消解方案[J].逻辑学研究,2011,4(2):81-92. 被引量:3

二级参考文献13

  • 1江天骥.归纳逻辑的新进展[J].哲学研究,1986(2):22-29. 被引量:2
  • 2C. David & J. Williamson, Foundations of Bayesianism, Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
  • 3C. Howson & P. Urbach, Scientific Reasoning : The Bayesian Approach, La Salle.. Open Court Publishing Company, 1989.
  • 4H. E. Kyburg, Epistemology and Inference, Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
  • 5H. Jeffreys, Theory of Probability, Oxford : Clarendon Press, 19 61.
  • 6C. Glymour, Theory and Evidence, Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1980.
  • 7J. Earman , Ba yes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory ,Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992.
  • 8D. Kahneman & A. Tversky," Subjective Probability: A Judgement of Representativeness," Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 3 ( 1972), pp. 430 - 454.
  • 9G. Gigerenzer & U. Hoffrage," How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats, "Psychological Review ,Vol. 102 ,No. 4(1995) ,pp. 684 - 704.
  • 10G. Gigerenzer & U. Hoffrage,"Overeoming Difficulties in Bayesian Reasoning: A Reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999),"PsychologicalReview,Vol. 106,No. 2(1999),pp. 425-430.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部