摘要
本文以国内受关注程度较高的四种人文社科期刊评价体系——《中文核心期刊要目总览》、《中国学术期刊评价研究报告》、《中国人文社会科学核心期刊要览》、《中文社会科学引文索引》为研究对象,从评价目的、评价方法、评价结果三个维度展开比较,分析各自的特点,讨论存在的问题。
This paper focuses on the four most popular evaluation systems for the academic periodicals of humanities and social sciences in China-A Guide to the Core Journals of China, A Report on Chinese Academic Journals Evaluation, A Guide to the Humanities & Social Science Core Journals in China and Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index. A comparative study was made from the following three dimensions: evaluation purpose, evaluation method and evaluation outcome, so as to analyze the respective features and existing problems of the four evaluation systems mentioned above.
出处
《图书馆工作与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期66-70,共5页
Library Work and Study
关键词
期刊评价
评价目的
评价方法
核心期刊
Periodical evaluation
Evaluation purpose
Evaluation method
Core periodicals