期刊文献+

对于结核艾滋病双重感染患者不同治疗方式死亡率的Meta分析 被引量:1

A Meta analysis about mortality of different treatment in TB/HIV co-infected patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较不同阶段实施高效抗反转录病毒(HAART)治疗的结核、艾滋病双重感染者的死亡情况,为治疗提供进一步的证据支持。方法通过对Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL)等数据库进行文献检索,查找针对结核、艾滋病双重感染患者早期进行ART治疗以及晚期进行ART治疗的临床随机对照试验。采用固定效应模型对所纳入的文献进行Meta分析,并对其发表偏倚进行评估。结果共纳入7篇临床对照试验研究的文献进行分析。患者死亡率的总体OR值为0.64(95%CI:0.50~0.82),表明早期ART治疗组的死亡率低于晚期ART治疗组(P<0.05)。结论对双重感染患者早期进行ART治疗能够明显降低其死亡率。 Objective To compare the difference of mortality between TB/HIV co-infected patients with early initiation high active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) versus and TB/HIV co-infected patients with later initiation of HAART versus. Methods A systematic search of the literature by searching electronic databases PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled was carried out for the clinical trials about early initiation HAART versus later initiation of HAART versus in TB/HIV co-infected patients. Two reviewers selected eligible trials and extracted information, respectively. Studies were pooled using a fixed effect model, conducting additional analyses by publication bias evaluation. Results Pooling 7 trials, the overall odds ratio of mortality between early ART groups and later ART groups was 0.64 (95%CI: 0.50-0.82). The mortality in early ART groups was significantly lower than the later ART groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion The initiation of ART to TB/HIV co-infected patients at an early stage can reduce the risk of mortality.
出处 《中国慢性病预防与控制》 CAS 2013年第2期136-139,共4页 Chinese Journal of Prevention and Control of Chronic Diseases
关键词 结核 艾滋病 高效抗病毒治疗 META分析 Mycobacterium tuberculosis HIV HAART Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1陈品儒,萧芃.艾滋病合并结核病的研究现况[J].临床肺科杂志,2010,15(7):1002-1003. 被引量:19
  • 2WHO. TB/HIV facts for 2011 [ R ].
  • 3Santoro-Lopes G, Felix AM, Harrison LH, et al. Reduced risk of tuberculosis among Brazilian patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy[J ]. Clin Infect Dis, 2002, 34(4) : 543-546.
  • 4Breen RA, Smith c j, Bettinson H, et al. Paradoxical reactions during tuberculosis treatment in patients with and without HIV co-infection [ J ]. Thorax, 2004, 59(8 ) : 704-707.
  • 5Lawn SD, Myer L, Orrell C, et al. Early mortality among adults accessing a community-based antiretmviral service in South Africa: implicationsforprogrammedesign[J].AIDS, 2005, 19(18):2141-2148.
  • 6Chang SY, Lin SW, Hung CC. Do we still need lead-in dosing of nevirapine in HIV-infected patients who are receiving rifampicin- containing antituberculous therapy [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2009, 49(9) : 1452-1453.
  • 7Cohen K, Meintjes G. Management of individuals requiring antiretroviral therapy and TB treatment [J]. Curr Opin HIV AIDS, 2010, 5( 1 ) : 61-69.
  • 8Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary [J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17( 1 ) : 1-12.
  • 9Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R.I, et al. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials[J]. JAMA, 1995, 273(5) :408-412.
  • 10Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with Publication and other biases in meta- analysis[J]. BMJ, 2001,323 (7304) : 101-105.

二级参考文献7

共引文献18

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部