高效初审中的误判现象及提高初审质量的策略

The Erroneous Judgment in Efficient First-Journalist-Examination and Its Strategy for Quality Improvement of First-Journalist-Examination

面对纷繁的来稿,在有限的时间里,为提高初审效率,编辑大多利用论文的信息点对论文进行初审。如果编辑仅将视角放在这些信息点上,将论文程序化初审,会抹杀论文的多样性,导致误送劣质稿和误弃优质稿。编辑应通过关注文章质量本身,增强初审责任心,提高自身学术水平等方式来减少对文章的误判。

To improve the efficiency of the first drafts in journalist examination in limited time, editors mostly make use of paper＇ s information points for the first examination. If editors＇ attention is only attached to these information points and examines papers in programmed, it leads to weaken the diversity of the papers. Furthermore, it leads to summit the inferior drafts and to abandon high-quality ones. To reduce the erroneous judgment in editing process, edi-tors should focus on the article, and should enhance the responsibility and improve their academic level.