文人相轻:文学评论与评论文学

Scholars Scorn:Literature Review and Comment on Literature

文人相轻一直受"道德论"排斥。即使论道德也是单向思维,没有辩证关照。至于与道德无关的其他方面更无从关照。文人相轻的科学研究长期以来是空白。文人相轻的话语,十之八九是文学评论。文人相轻的发生,出于文人嫉妒和骄傲的心理驱力;由此产生的评论,以是否"公允"为标准衡量,缺乏前提,也弄错了对象。文人相轻的文本,有不少"有益"的"内存":既评论文学艺术,又创造文学艺术;既是方式,又是体裁。可以促进文学评论的发展和深化。在时空距离使道德关注疏离和淡化的现代以至将来,对相轻的文本审美体验和艺术欣赏成为可能。即使是"片面的深刻"也因其"精彩",成为与受众交流的第一切合点。其语言艺术对文学评论的语言建构有借鉴价值。

The concept that scholars have always scomed each other has always been rejected by the morality. As for morality it is a single idea without dialectic care. Concerning the other fields there is without care of morality. It is no other care about. As for the scientific research for the concept of scholar scorn has been blank. The remarks of scholar scorn are mainly the literature comment. Why the writers tend to think poorly of another that comes the writers psychological drive because they are always arrogant and jealous. So the writer＇s comment is not justice. The version of the writers who look down each other existed fine access memory. They both comment literature and art and creation them both method and type as well. That may urge to promote progress and advance deepening of the literature comment and review; It may weaken the present and future in the field of time and space distance of morality concerning disappearing and become faint of the present and future. The aesthetic becomes vision as appreciation art,. It is a moment impression that becomes ＂brilliant scene＂ that the value of its remarks is of use for consideration to literature comment remarks