期刊文献+

120W/2μm铥激光前列腺汽化剜除术治疗BPH的疗效观察 被引量:12

Curative effect of 120W/2μm Thulium∶YAG laser vapoenucleation of the prostate therapy BPH
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨120W/2μm铥激光前列腺汽化剜除术(ThuVEP)的安全性及疗效。方法:应用120 W连续波2μm ThuVEP治疗BPH患者59例,分析患者术前资料及围术期情况,并对相应并发症进行评估。结果:患者平均前列腺体积(59.6±29.6)ml,平均手术时间(96.2±26.9)min,剜除时间(40.6±25.7)min,平均保留尿管时间(5.7±1.0)d。59例术后3个月随访效果良好。手术前后生活质量(QOL)评分为(4.5±1.2)∶(1.5±0.9)分,国际前列腺症状(IPSS)评分为(22.5±6.9)∶(4.9±1.3)分,最大尿流率为(7.9±4.6)∶(25.2±11.3)ml/s,剩余尿量为(148.6±76.5)∶(23.5±28.6)ml。2例术后需输血治疗。并发尿道狭窄2例。结论:120 W/2μmThuVEP治疗BPH是安全有效的,且并发症较少。 Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 120 W/2 μm Thulium : yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for patients with benign prostate hyperplasia. Method: In total, 59 consecutive patients undergoing ThuVEP at our institution were evaluated prospectively. ThuVEP was carried out using the 120 W/2 μm continuous-wave Tm : YAG laser. Patient perioperative and 3 month follow-up data were analysed. The complications were assessed. Result: Mean preoperative prostate volume was (59. 6 ± 29. 6) ml. Total operation time averaged(96.2±26.9) min, and the enucleation time was (40.6±25.7) min. The mean catheter time was (5.7± 1.0) days. All patients were available for review at the 3-month follow-up mark. Quality of life (4.5± 1.2) : (1.5±0.9), international prostate symptom score (22.5±6.9) : (4.9±1.3), maximum urinary flow rate (7.9±4.6) : (25.2±11.3) ml/s and postvoiding residual urine (148.6±76.5) : (23.5±28.6) ml. Two patients needed blood transfusions postoperatively. Urethral stricture developed in 2 respectively of the patients. Conclusion: 120 W/2 μm ThuVEP is a safe and efficacious procedure for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction. The incidence of complications with ThuVEP was low.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2013年第4期273-275,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 前列腺增生 Tm∶YAG激光 铥激光前列腺汽化剜除术 benign prostate hyperplasia Tm : YAG laser Thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Kuntz R M. Current role of lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) [J]. Eur Urol, 2006, 49:961-969.
  • 2Ahyai S A, Gilling P, Kaplan S A, et al. Meta-analy- sis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symp- toms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58:384-397.
  • 3Kelly D C, Das A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Can J Urol, 2012, 19:6131-6134.
  • 4Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, et al. Holmium la- ser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, random- ized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Urol, 2004, 172:1926-1929.
  • 5Hauser S, Rogenhofer S, Ellinger J, et al. Thulium la- ser (Revolix) vapoenucleation of the prostate is a safe procedure in patients with an increased risk of hemor- rhage[J]. Urollnt, 2012, 88:390-394.
  • 6Bach T, Netseh C, Pohlmann L, et al. Thulium ." YAG vapoenucleation in large volume prostates[J]. J Urol, 2011, 186:2323-2327.
  • 7Fu W J, Zhang X, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of 2-mi- crom continuous wave laser vaporesection of the pros- tate and transurethral resection of the prostate- a pro- spective nonrandomized trial with 1-year f611ow-up[J]. Urology, 2010, 75:194-199.
  • 8Bach T, Huek N, Wezel F, et al. 70 vs 120 W thuli- um: yttrium-aluminium-garnet 2 microm continuous- Wave laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyper- plasia: a systematic ex-vivo evaluation[J]. BJ J Int, 2010, 106:368-372.
  • 9Naspro R, Baehmann A, Gilling P, et al. A review of the recent evidence (2006-2008) for 532-nm photoselee- tive laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of The prostate[J]. EurUrol, 2009, 55:1345-1357.
  • 10Matlaga B R, Kim S C, Kuo R L, et al. Holmium la- ser enucleation of the prostate for prostates of 125 ml [J]. BJUInt, 2006, 97:81-84.

同被引文献89

引证文献12

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部