期刊文献+

有限切开复位与闭合复位治疗儿童GartlandⅢ型肱骨髁上骨折的疗效比较 被引量:32

Limited open reduction versus closed reduction in treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较有限切开复位与闭合复位内固定治疗儿童GartlandⅢ型肱骨髁上骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2008午1月至2010年12月收治并扶随访的98例JLNGartland11I型肱骨髁上骨折患者资料,其中有限切开复位组(行内侧或外侧小切口切开复位内固定)78例,男53例,女25例;平均年龄为75.9个月。闭合复位组(行闭合复位内固定)20例,男15例,女5例;平均年龄为70.7个月。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中透视次数和骨折愈合时间。术后3个月和1年时采用Flynn肘关节坪分标准评定疗效。结果有限切开复值组手术时间[(52.2±7.0)mm]较闭合复位组[(72.8±13.7)min]短;术中透视次数[(3.3±1.0)次]少于闭合复位组](9.9±1.9)次],差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。所有患者术后获12~24个月(平均16.3个月)随访,均在术后4周获骨折临床愈合,术后2个月获骨性愈合。按照Flynn肘关节评分标准评定疗效:术后3个月有限切开复值组优良率[24.4(19/78)]与闭合复位组[30%(6/20)]比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);术后1年有限切开复位组优良率[100%(78/78)]与闭合复位组[95%(19/20)],比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组均无骨折延迟愈合、骨筋膜间室综合征和医源性血管冲经损伤等并发症发生,无一例需再次行髁上截骨术。结论有限切开复位与闭合复位治疗儿童GartlandⅢ肱骨髁上骨折,骨折愈合时间相同,而无法闭合复位的儿童GartlandⅢ型肱骨髁上骨折可通过有限切开复位获得满意复位,且后者手术时间短、术中透视次数少、术后1年患者肘关节功能更好。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of limited open reduction versus closed reduction in treatment of supracondylar humenrus fractres (GartlandⅢ) in children. Methods The clinical data of 98 children who had been treat for supracondylar humerus fractures (GartlandⅢ ) inour department from January 2008 to December 2010 were available for the present retrosptive analysis.Eighty-seven patients were treated with open reduction via a limited medial or lateral incision followed hy internal fixation while the other 20 with closed reduction followed by internal fixation. In the limited open reduetion group, there were 53 boys and 25 girls, with a mean age of 76.4 months; in the closed reduction group, there were 15 boys and 5 girls, with a mean age of70. 7 months. The 2 goups were compared in terms of operative time,intraoperative radiography frequency, fracture healing, Flynn elbow scoring at 3 and 12 months postoperation. Results Compared with the closed reduction group, the limited open reduction group needed significantly shorter average operative time (52. 2 ± 7.0 minutes versus 72, 8± 13, 7 minutes) and significantly lower average intraoperative radiography frequency (3.3 ±1.0 times venus 9. 9 ± 1.9times) ( P 〈 0.05). The 98 patients received a mean follow-up of 16. 3 months (from 12 to 24 months). All the fractures achieved clinical healing at 4 weeks post-operation and bony union at 2 months post-operation. By the Flynn elbow scoring at 3 months postoperation, the good to excellent rate was 24.4 % (19/78) in the limited open reduction group and 30.0% (6/20) in the closed reduction group, with no signiificant difference ( P 〉 0.05) . However, the good to excellent rate at 12 months post-operation was 100% (78/78) in the limited open reduction group and 30.0% (6/20) in the closed reduction group, with no significant difference ( P 〉 0.05) . However, the good to excellent rate at 12 months post-operation was 100% (78/78) in the limited open reduction group and 95.0% (19/20) in the closed reduction group, with a significant difference (P 〈 0.05). No delayed union, compartment syndrome or iatrogenic lesions to vessels and nerves occurred and no supracondylar osteotomy was needed in either group.Conclusions In treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures (Gartland type Ⅲ) in children, both limited open reduction and closed reduction can lead to fracture healing in similar time and similar functional recovery of the elbow. It is essential to perform limited open reduction when closed reduction fails. Limited open reduction can result in shorter operative time, lower intraoperative radiography frequency and better functional outcomes.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期298-302,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 肘关节 肱骨骨折 骨折固定术 儿童 Elbow joint Humeral fractures Fracture fixation, internal Child
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1杨建平.儿童肱骨髁上骨折的现代处理[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2009,11(4):302-305. 被引量:100
  • 2Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years' experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1974, 56: 263-272.
  • 3郭源,王承武,范源,张建立.儿童“不可复性”肱骨髁上骨折的治疗[J].中华小儿外科杂志,1998,19(2):67-69. 被引量:22
  • 4Sfivastava S. The results of open reduction and pin fixation in dis- placed supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Med J Malaysia, 2000, 55 Suppl C: 44-48.
  • 5Reitman RD, Waters P, Millis M. Open reduction and internal fixa- tion for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Or- thop, 2001, 21: 157-161.
  • 6Zionts LE, McKellop HA, Hathway R. Torsional strength of pin configurations used to fix supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1994, 76: 253-256.
  • 7冯超,郭源,张建立.克氏针治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的穿针方式效果分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2008,29(5):291-293. 被引量:41
  • 8Davis RT, Gorczyca JT, Pugh K. Supracondyiar humerus fractures in children, comparison of operative treatment methods. Clin OrLhop Relat Res, 2000 (376): 49-55.

二级参考文献22

  • 1王晓东,冯林,朱振洪,王科文,张锡庆,尹航.经皮克氏针固定治疗严重移位的肱骨髁上骨折[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2005,26(12):646-648. 被引量:20
  • 2Lyons JP, Ashley E, Holler MM. Ulnar nerve palsies after percutaneous cross-pinning of supracondylar fractures in children's elbows. J Pediatr Orthop, 1998,18: 43-45.
  • 3Skaggs DL, Hale JM,Bassett J, et al. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children, the consequences of pin placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001,83: 735- 740.
  • 4France J, Strong M. Deformity and function in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children variously treated by closed reduction and splinting, traction, and percutaneous pinning. J Pediatr Orthop, 1992,12 : 494-498.
  • 5Topping RE, Blanco JS, Davis TJ. Clincal evaluation of crossed- pin versus lateral-pin fixation in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop, 1995,15 : 435-439.
  • 6Steven S, Andrew T, Doug M. Displaced Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: biomechanical analysis of percutaneous pinning techniques. J Pediatr Orthop,2002,22: 440-443.
  • 7Zionts LE, McKellop HA, Hathaway R. Torsional strength of pin configurations used to fix supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1994,76: 253-256.
  • 8Williamson DM,Coates CJ,Miller RK, et al. Normal characteristics of the Baumann angle: an aid in assessment of supracondylar fractures. J Pediatr Orthop, 1992,12: 636-639.
  • 9Camp J, Ishizue K,Gomez M, et al. Alteration of Baumann's angle by humeral position., implications for treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop, 1993,13 :521-525.
  • 10Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: sixteen years' experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1974,56: 263-272.

共引文献147

同被引文献266

引证文献32

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部