期刊文献+

冲突性信息对消费者信息搜索行为的影响——基于功能性食品健康声称的实证研究 被引量:10

Effects of Conflicting Information on Consumers' Information Search Behavior: A Study Based on Functional Food Health Claims
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过实验法研究有关健康声称的冲突性信息是否以及如何影响消费者的行为。结果发现:当有关功能性食品健康声称的有效性存在相互冲突(相对于互补)的信息时,消费者的信息搜索倾向更强;认知闭合需要在冲突性信息对消费者信息搜索倾向的影响中起反向调节作用;消费者对健康元素的矛盾态度是有关功能性食品健康声称的冲突性信息对消费者信息搜索倾向影响的中介变量。 This paper investigates whether and how conflicting information about functional ingredient influences consumer behavior through experimental method. The results from experimental study are as follows: (I) In the presence of conflicting (versus complementary) information about efficacy of a particular functional ingredient, consumers are more likely to search new information. (2) Need for cognitive closure negatively moderates the effect of conflicting information on consumer's information search intention. (3) The attitudinal ambivalence about healthy ingredient mediates the effect of conflicting information on con- sumer's information search intention.
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期114-121,共8页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目"有关健康声称的信息冲突对消费者的影响研究"(11YJC630077) 教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目"企业家的‘傻劲’:最优水平及驱动因素研究"(09YJC63049) 国家自然科学基金青年项目"网络口碑对线上和线下渠道中产品销量的影响"(71202006)资助
关键词 健康声称 冲突性信息 认知闭合需要 矛盾态度 信息搜索 health claims conflicting information need for cognitive closure attitudinal ambivalence information search
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1黄敏学,谢亭亭,冯小亮.矛盾的消费者是如何解读多元化口碑信息的?[J].心理学报,2010,42(10):998-1010. 被引量:41
  • 2刘雪峰,梁钧平.认知闭合需要的测量及其对工作结果的影响[J].经济科学,2007(4):119-128. 被引量:21
  • 3BARON R M, KENNY D A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [ J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6) : 1173 - 1182.
  • 4BLODGET T J, HILL D. 1991. An exploratory study comparing amount of search measure to consumer reliance on each source of information [J]. Advance in Consumer Research, 18( 1 ) :773 -779.
  • 5CACIOPPO J T, BERNTSON G G. 1994. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review,with emphasis on the separa- bility of positive and negative substrates [ J]. Psychological Bulletin, 115 (5) :401 - 423.
  • 6CHUNG H - Y, RASMUSSEN H M, JOHNSON E J. 2004. Lutein bioavailability is higher from lutein - enriched eggs than from supplements and spinach in men [J]. Journal of Nutrition, 134(8) :1887 -1893.
  • 7DE DREU C K W, KOOLE S L, OLDERSMA F L. 1999. On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation [ J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (3) :348 -362.
  • 8DURRHEIM K, FOSTER D. 1997. Tolerance of ambiguity as a content specific construct [ J]. Personality and Individual Difference, 22 (5) :741 -750.
  • 9ENGEL J F, BLACKWELL R D, MINIARD P W. 1993. Consumer behavior [ M]. Hinsdale: Dryden Press:115 - 125.
  • 10HASS R G, KATZ 1, R1ZZO N, et al. 1992. When racial ambivalence evokes negative affect, using a disguised measure of mood [ J ]. Per- sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (6) :786 -797.

二级参考文献69

  • 1Adejumo, G., Duimering, P. R., & Zhong, Z. (2008). A balance theory approach to group problem solving. Social Networks,30(1), 83-99.
  • 2Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 637-653.
  • 3Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 183-94.
  • 4Bohlmann, J. D., Rosa, J. A., Bolton, R. N., & Qualls, W. J. (2006). The effect of group interactions on satisfaction judgments: satisfaction escalation. Marketing Science, 25(4), 301-321.
  • 5Brown, J. J. & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 350-362.
  • 6Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (2), 109-126.
  • 7Cacioppo, J T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G.G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-25.
  • 8Cavazza, N., & Butebra, F. (2008). Bending without breaking: Examining the role of attitudinal ambivalence in resisting persuasive communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1-15.
  • 9Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R, (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 565-577.
  • 10Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

共引文献60

同被引文献157

引证文献10

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部