期刊文献+

试析宋代滥用“内降”的弊端

Analysis of the Drawbacks of“Neijiang”in Song Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内降是帝王违背封建政府正常颁诏程序,直接由内宫下达给有关部门的行政命令。宋代内降不经审核监督,直接付外执行的特点,给社会生活带来了一系列弊端:首先它直接冲击着权力制约体系,使其丧失驳正救失、权力制衡的重要作用;在行政上,内降不利于作出正确的决策,容易导致政归幸门、号令数变以及官员怠职和素质低下;在军事上,内降缺乏实际的应变能力,钳制了军队作战,削弱了军事实力;在爵赏上,内降非次迁擢使恩赏制度失去了奖励功绩、选拔人才的重要作用,助长了侥幸贿赂之风;在司法上,内降法外开恩、引例破法,干涉司法审判,僭越法律条文;在财政上,内降恩泽使财政收入相对减少,开支日益扩大,老百姓生活也因此遭到压榨和侵扰。关键词:内降;滥用; "Neijiang" in Song Dynasty refers to the arbitrary executive commands which went against the normal edict proce- dure authorized by the feudal government and was transmitted to relevant departments directly by certain people serving the emperors. This kind of commands, which weren' t supervised but directly executed, brought about a series of negative effects on the society. First of all, it exerted a negative impact on the system of power restriction, making it lose the important function of correcting wrong decisions and restricting the abuse of powers. From the perspective of administration, "Neijiang" was harmful to the making of correct decisions, which would lead to the inconsistency of orders and policies, the failure of accomplishing tasks, officials' lack of the sense of responsibility, and the deterioration of their working styles. As to military, "Neijiang" was not flexible enough in practice and actually undermined the fighting abilities of the army. In terms of rewarding, "Neijiang", which promoted and diminished people suddenly, made the system of awarding talents and selecting competent people fail to function, and also increased the malpractice of bribing. From judicial perspective, "Neijiang" had a negative influence upon the judicial justice and made personal orders surpass the law and law less powerful and authoritative. From the perspective of finance, "Neijiang" reduced the financial revenue and increased the expenditures correspondingly, thus lowering down the living standards of the mass.
作者 余春燕
出处 《廉政文化研究》 2013年第2期81-90,共10页 Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
关键词 内降 滥用 弊端 "Neijiang" abuse drawbacks
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1曾敏行.独醒杂志.丛书集成初编本丛书集成初编本[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
  • 2袁燮.絜斋集.丛书集成初编本丛书集成初编本[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
  • 3赵汝愚.宋朝诸臣奏议.点校本点校本[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999.
  • 4脱脱.宋史.点校本点校本[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
  • 5黄淮;杨士奇.历代名臣奏议.影印本影印本[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.
  • 6高斯得.耻堂存稿.丛书集成初编本丛书集成初编本[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
  • 7李焘.续资治通鉴长编.点校本点校本[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
  • 8徐松.宋会要辑稿.影印本影印本[M].北京:中华书局,1957.
  • 9王应麟.困学纪闻.影印文渊阁四库全书本影印文渊阁四库全书本[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆股份有限公司,1982.
  • 10张邦炜.北宋亡国与权力膨胀[J].天府新论,2000(1):76-81. 被引量:6

二级参考文献43

  • 1王栐.《燕翼诒谋录》卷五[M].中华书局,1981年.第47页.
  • 2陆游.《老学庵笔记》卷一[M].,..
  • 3李焘:《续资治通鉴长编》卷四百八十、卷二百一十三.
  • 4罗从彦:《罗豫章集》卷三、卷五.
  • 5刘攽:《彭城集》卷三十七《吴公墓志铭》.
  • 6《靖康要录》卷十六.
  • 7庄绰:《鸡肋编》卷下.
  • 8陈均:《九朝编年备要》卷二十六.
  • 9《宋史》卷四百七十二《蔡京传》、卷四百六十八《梁师成传》、卷三百六十三《陈禾传》、卷一百六十一《职官志一·三公》、卷一百六十一《职官志一·尚书省》、卷十九《徽宗本纪一》、卷三百五十一《朱谔传》、卷三百五十六《许敦仁传》、卷三百四十八《洪彦升传·论曰》、卷四百七十《朱勔传》、卷四百七十二《蔡京传》、卷三百五十一《郑居中传·论曰》、卷四百七十《王黼传》、卷三百五十二《吴敏传》.
  • 10赵汝愚编:《宋朝诸臣奏议》卷六十一《内侍上》、卷二十三《诏令下》.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部