期刊文献+

青少年两难决策的困难认知研究 被引量:2

A Tentative Exploration on Difficulty Cognition of Dilemma in Youngsters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的初步探索青少年学生面临两难选择时困难认知的特点。方法先采用行为实验对240名大中学生两难选择困难感知特点进行测试,其次借助德国SMI视线追踪系统,测定44名大学生在两难选择时的即时反应特点。结果①在医生救助和手术签字两难中,两种条件下大学生和中学生均认为"现有的医疗资源只能救活一个人"和"签字和保全性命的关系"是理解困难的地方;②在手术签字两难的两个分支前提中,仅平均注视时间在两种难度之间差异显著(t=-5.104,P<0.01;t=-3.317,P<0.01);回视次数在两种难度之间差异不显著(t=0.060,P>0.01;t=-3.317,P>0.01);③手术签字两难中第二分支前提注视时间所占比例显著大于第一分支前提的相应比例。结论行为实验和眼动实验一致表明,在面临重大两难决策时,大中学生均有凭直觉判断的特点。 Objective To find the characteristics of youngsters' difficulty cognition in face of the most important dilemma.Methods First 240 school students and undergraduates attended the pen and paper experiment,then 44 college students participated eye movement study.Results ① In the dilemma of doctor help and signature for surgery,subjects regarded "merely one person could be saved in the condition of current medical resources" and "the relation between signature and saving from danger" as difficulty of understanding.②On the two premises of dilemma of signature,there was significant difference of average fixation times between two types of dilemma(t=-5.104,P0.01;t=-3.317,P0.01),while there was no marked difference of regression fixation counts between the two(t=0.060,P0.01;t=-3.317,P0.01).③The fixation proportion of the second premise(10.29) was higher than that of the first premise(7.65).Conclusion While faced with the most important dilemma,the youth students would make a decision with instinctive judgment.
作者 周鹏生
出处 《人类工效学》 2013年第1期1-5,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics
基金 中央高校基本科研业务专项资金项目(zyz2011086) 西北民族大学精品课程建设项目资助(JP-KC201103)
关键词 青少年 两难决策 困难认知 直觉判断 视觉追踪系统 道德判断 youngster decision dilemma difficulty cognition instinct judgment eye movement moral judgment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Gilligan C, Attanucci J. Two Moral Orientations: Gender Differences and Similarities [ J ]. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 1988, 34(2): 223-237.
  • 2Wark G R, Krebs D L. The Construction of Moral Dilemmas in Everyday Life [J]. Journal of Moral E- ducation, 2000, 29(1): 5-21.
  • 3Von Borgstede C, Dahlstrand U, Biel A. From Ought to is: Moral Norms in Large-scale Social Dilemmas [ J ]. Gteborg Psychological Reports, 1999, 29 (5): 1-19.
  • 4Nicholsa S, Mallona R. Moral Dilemmas and Moral Rules [J]. Cognition, 2006, 100(3): 530-542.
  • 5Bueciarelli M. The Psychology of Moral Reasoning [J]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2008, 3(2):121 -139.
  • 6周鹏生.大学生两难推理加工眼动特点的初步研究[J].山西大同大学学报(自然科学版),2012,28(1):74-77. 被引量:1
  • 7周鹏生.事件出现时间和知觉次序对两难决策的影响[J].人类工效学,2011,17(4):9-12. 被引量:1
  • 8Haidt J. The Emotional Dog Social Intuitionist Approach Psychological Review, 2001, and its Rational Tail: A to Moral Judgment [J]. 108(4): 814-834.

二级参考文献19

同被引文献20

  • 1彭永新,龙立荣.大学生职业决策自我效能测评的研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(2):38-43. 被引量:404
  • 2周鹏生.民族院校大学生人际关系的“应然”和“实然”[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版),2007,20(9):53-56. 被引量:3
  • 3BONATTI L. Propositional Reasoning by Model [J]. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 1994, 101(4): 725-733.
  • 4JOHNSON-LAIRD P N. Deductive Reasoning [J], Annual Review of Psychology, 1999,50: 109— 135.
  • 5JOHNSON-LAIRD P N, BYRNE R M J. Conditionals: A Theory of Meaning,Pragmatics, and Inference [J]. Psycho-logical Review, 2002 , 109(4) : 646 — 678.
  • 6EVANS J S B T. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning,Judgment, and Social Cognition [J]. Annual Review Psychol-ogy, 2008, 59(1): 255-278.
  • 7EPLEY N, GILOVICH T. The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic Why the Adjustments rre Insufficient [J], Psycho-logical Science? 2006,17(4): 311 — 318.
  • 8HAIDT J. The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment [J], Psychologi-cal Review, 2001., 108(4) : 814 — 834.
  • 9MATTHEWS P,RITTLE-JOHNSON B. In Pursuit of Knowledge: Comparing Self-Explanations, Concepts, and Proce-dures as Pedagogical Tools [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2009,104(1) : 1 — 21.
  • 10梅敏君,王大伟.情绪对职业决策的影响[J].心理科学,2009,32(4):986-988. 被引量:18

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部