期刊文献+

Pancherz分析法评估Twin-block矫治器治疗青少年安氏Ⅱ~1错的硬组织效应 被引量:6

Pancherz analysis in evaluating the hard tissue change of Class Ⅱ~1 malocclusion treated by Twin-block appliance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解排除了自然生长因素后,Twin-block矫治器治疗青少年安氏Ⅱ1错引起的硬组织改变,从而更为真实、准确地评价该矫治器的矫治效能。方法于2008年9月至2010年9月在河北医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科门诊选择30例手腕骨片为FG-G期的安氏Ⅱ1下颌后缩患者。治疗组15例,平均年龄11.5岁,采用Twin-block矫正器治疗,平均治疗及保持时间14个月;对照组15例,平均年龄11岁,作为自然生长对照,平均观察时间13个月。对治疗及观察前后头颅X线侧位片的32项硬组织项目进行Pancherz测量分析,评价矫治疗效。结果在排除了自然生长后,下颌全长、升支高度及下颌体长分别净增加了4.95、4.03和1.67mm,SNB角(蝶鞍中心、鼻根点及下齿槽座点所构成的角)增加了2.39°;前、后面高及前下面高均明显增加,但下颌平面保持稳定;上切牙舌倾、下切牙唇倾,治疗组4.76mm的覆盖减少量和5.22mm磨牙关系改善中,牙齿效应分别占61%和75%,骨骼效应占39%和25%。结论 Twin-block矫治器使发育期安氏Ⅱ1错患者覆覆盖、磨牙关系均得到改善,有效促进了下颌骨矢状方向上的生长发育,Ⅱ类骨面型趋于好转。 Objective To investigate the skeletal and dental changes produced by the Twin-block appliance excluding the influence of natural growth in order to reflect the treatment effect more objectively and accurately. Methods The study consisted of 30 children with class Ⅱ^1 malocclusion and retrognathic mandible. One group (averaged 11.5 years) was treated with Twin-block appliance for an average of 14 months; the other group (averaged 11 years old) was observed for 13 months without treatment. The cephalometric data of two groups before and after treatment or control was analyzed with Pancherz statistically. Results After treatment , the mandible unit length, the ramus height and the mandibular body length increased by 4.95 mm, 4.03mm and 1.67 mm respectively, excluding the influence of natural growth. The SNB angle increased by 2.39°. The anterior facial height and posterior facial height increased obviously, but the angle of mandibular plane was stable. The upper incisor retroclined and the lower incisor proclined; overjet and molar relationship was corrected by 4.76 mm and 5.22 mm in the treatment group, of which 61% and 75% was due to dental effect, 39% and 25% due to skeletal effect. Conclusion Deep overbite, deep overjet, and molar relation can be improved greatly by the Twin-block appliance. It can promote the mandibular growth sagitally and vertically; the correction of Class Ⅱ skeletal relation can be achieved.
出处 《中国实用口腔科杂志》 CAS 2013年第3期153-157,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 PANCHERZ分析法 TWIN-BLOCK矫治器 头影测量 安氏Ⅱ1错[牙合] 功能矫治 Pancherz analysis Twin-block appli- ance cephalometric Class Ⅱ^1 malocclusion func- tional treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Cura N, Sarac M, Ozttirk Y, et al. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appli- ances: a comparative study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop, 1996, 110( 1 ) : 36-45.
  • 2Parkin NA, McKeown HF, Sandier PJ. Comparison of 2 modifi- cations of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II sam- ples [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 119 (6) : 572-577.
  • 3Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin block appliances. Part I -The hard tis- sues [J].Eur J Orthod 1998, 20(5):501-516.
  • 4Ozturk Y, Tankuter N.Class II: a comparson of activator and ac- tivator headgear combination appliances [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1994, 16(2) : 149-157.
  • 5Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the Twin block ap- pliance: a cephalometric study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- tbop, 1998, 114(1):15-24.
  • 6Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appli- ance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop, 2000, 117(1): 54-59.
  • 7Lund DI, Sandier PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks : a prospective 3ontrolled study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 113(1): 104-110.
  • 8左艳萍,徐宝华,刘学聪.双垫矫治器矫治安格尔Ⅱ类错的体会[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(1):31-32. 被引量:31
  • 9Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Amiri SS. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II Division 1 malocclu- sion [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(4) : 354-358.
  • 10赵志河,URBAN HAGG,RABIE ABM,沈刚.固定功能矫治器前伸大鼠下颌后颞下颌关节窝新骨形成的定量评价[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1999,17(2):152-154. 被引量:9

二级参考文献3

  • 1Clark WJ. The twinblock technigue. Am J Orthod 1988; 93: 1.
  • 2Clark WJ. The twinblock traction technigue. Eur J Orthod 1982; 4: 129.
  • 3Hagg U, Tarange J. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt.Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 299.

共引文献39

同被引文献72

  • 1陈卓,赵曼,刘惠莉.Twinblock矫治安氏Ⅱ~1类错畸形硬组织改变的研究[J].中国美容医学,2007,16(5):685-687. 被引量:6
  • 2徐芸.口腔正畸学-现代原理与技术[M].天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,1996:447-450;384-434
  • 3张雷英,蔡中.Bionator和Twin-block矫治器治疗Ⅱ类错疗效比较[J].口腔医学,2007,27(9):481-484. 被引量:3
  • 4Macnamara J'A. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age[J]. Angle Orthod, 1981, 51(3): 177-202.
  • 5Toth LR, McNamara JA. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Ffankel compared with an untreated Class H sample[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 116(6): 597-609.
  • 6Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, bionator and Twin-block appliances. Part I: the hard tissues[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1998, 20(5): 501-516.
  • 7Johnston LE Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments: a retrospective/prospective alternative[J]. Clin Orthod Res, 1998, 1(2): 142-146.
  • 8Ashok K J, Ritu D, Hari P. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twinblock and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: A comparative study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(5): 594-602.
  • 9Clark WJ. The Twin-block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system[J]. Am J Orthod Dantofacial Orthop, 1988, 93(1): 1-18.
  • 10Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 113(1): 104-110.

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部