摘要
分析实证主义法学对义务的认识,分别包括奥斯丁的以"命令"为中心的解说、凯尔森的以"制裁"为中心的解说、哈特的以"社会压力"为中心的解说,其各自都存在严重缺陷。该学说对法律义务的解释是一个真正失败的记录。义务的本体是一种社会意见,代表着社会大多数人的良知,理性的认识、看法。义务在本质上是对每个义务人的更大利益的维护。
understanding of obligations respectively including analytical positivism jurisprudence in Austin,centered on 'command' explanation,Hans kelsen,centered on 'sanctions' explanation,hart’s 'social pressure' centered,their respective have serious flaws.The theory to explain the legal obligation is a true record of failure.Obligations of ontology is a kind of social opinion,represents the social conscience and rational knowledge,view of most people.Obligations in essence are obligatory for each of the greater interests of the maintenance.
出处
《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期59-66,192,共8页
Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
法律义务
命令
制裁
社会压力
legal obligation
command
sanctions
social pressure
