期刊文献+

风险态度对建筑工程项目投标均衡策略的影响及对策 被引量:15

Effects and countermeasures regarding risk attitude in construction procurement equilibrium
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对建筑工程项目招标市场上投标人超低报价中标现象,在现有的最低价格密封报价招标的理论模型基础上,考虑投标人风险态度因素,运用不完全信息博弈理论给出了投标人均衡报价函数.通过对均衡策略特性的研究得到风险态度不同可能导致成本较高的承包商中标.提出利用多属性拍卖模型解决低价中标带来的低效问题,研究了该模型下投标人的最优投标策略.通过算例给出了采用多属性拍卖机制的某工程项目招投标及评分过程,分析了模型参数对均衡结果的影响.研究表明,多属性招投标中,投标人根据成本参数和属性权重先确定非价格属性值后再决定报价,同时由于减少合同的不确定性,使得投标人偏向风险中性,并且有效改变了低价中标现象. Aiming at the problem that the bidder wins the project with unrealistically low price in construction procurement market, the neutral risk-taking bidders in the first price sealed bid model are extended to the heterogeneous bidders. The equilibrium bid functions in the extended model are derived using game-theoretic analysis. It is concluded that the bid method with different risk-taking bidders has the potential to deliver the project to high cost contractor. Multi-attribute sealed-bid auc- tion mechanism is proposed to overcome the problem of unrealistically low price winning. The corre- sponding equilibrium strategies are provided to testify the efficiency of the mechanism. Finally, the bidding and scoring process is presented through a construction project bidding case, and the influ- ence of the model parameters on the bidding result is discussed. The research reveals that in multi-at- tribute auction non-price dimensions are chosen dependently on the weight and cost parameters and then bidding price is determined. This mechanism decreases the uncertainty of contract and changes the risk attitude of bidders to risk neutral to resolve the bidding problem.
出处 《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期431-435,共5页 Journal of Southeast University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51178116 71001027) 江苏省高校研究生科技创新计划资助项目
关键词 建设工程招投标 不完全信息博弈 风险态度 多属性拍卖 construction procurement incomplete information game risk attitude multi-attributeauction
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Mohamed K A, Khoury S S, Hafez S M. Contractors decision for bid profit reduction within opportunistic bidding behavior of claims recovery[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(1): 93-107.
  • 2Oo B L, Drew D S, Lo H P. A comparison of contractors decision to bid behavior according to different market environments[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2008, 26(4): 439-447.
  • 3Holt C A. Competitive bidding for contracts under alternative auction procedures[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88(3): 433-445.
  • 4Maskin E, Riley J. Asymmetric auctions[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2000, 67(3): 413-438.
  • 5Bajari P. Comparing competition and collusion: a numerical approach[J]. Economic Theory, 2001, 18(1): 187-205.
  • 6Cox J C, Smith V L, Walker J M. Theory and individual behavior in first-price auctions[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988, 1(1): 61-69.
  • 7Boening M V, Rassenti S J, Smith V. Numerical computation of equilibrium bid functions in a first-price auction with heterogeneous risk attitude[J]. Experimental Economics, 1998, 1(2): 147-159.
  • 8Chen Y, Katuscak P, Ozdenoren E. Sealed bid auctions with ambiguity: theory and experiments[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2007, 136(1): 513-535.
  • 9李建章.密封拍卖与土木工程招投标中的均衡投标策略[J].重庆交通学院学报,2006,25(1):120-124. 被引量:1
  • 10王维国,刘德海.建筑工程项目招标低价中标现象的不完全信息博弈理论分析[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(S1):444-449. 被引量:19

二级参考文献31

  • 1周蓉,张韩,王昊.不同质量权重评分规则下的多维招标机制设计[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(2):77-81. 被引量:2
  • 2张维迎.博弈论和信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店和上海人民出版社,1996.135-233.
  • 3Teich J E, Wallenius H, Wallenius J, et al. Emerging multiple issue e-auctions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159 (1): 1 16.
  • 4Bichler M. An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auction[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29: 249-268.
  • 5Chen-Ritzo C, Harrison T, Wasnica M K, et al. Better, faster, cheaper: A multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(12): 1753-1762.
  • 6Che Y K. Design competition through multidimensional auctions[J]. Journal of Economics, 1993, 24: 668-680.
  • 7Branco F. The design of multidimensional auctions[J]. Journal of Economics, 1997, 28(1): 63- 81.
  • 8Parkes D C, Kalagnanam J. Iterative multi-attribute vickrey auctions[J]. Management Science, 2004, Special Issue on Electronic Markets.
  • 9David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S. Protocols and strategies for automated multi-attributes auctions[C]// Proc of the 1st Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, Bologna, Italy, 2002: 77-85.
  • 10David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S. An English auction protocol for multi-attributes items[C]// Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: IV. Designing Mechanisms and Systems, LNAI, 2002, 2531: 5288.

共引文献48

同被引文献68

引证文献15

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部