摘要
《庄子渔父》篇中的渔父并非范蠡,首先,孔子与范蠡所活动的区域相距甚远;他们所从事活动毫不相干,这就导致他们不存在交往的可能。其次,渔父与范蠡的形象迥异、思想毫不相同。渔父只是庄子虚构的一个人物符号,是他达意的一个工具。庄子之所以虚构"渔父"的形象,由道家爱水乐水、钟情于水的情怀及庄氏家族流亡所致。
The character of Chuang Tzu Fisherman is not Fan Li.Firstly,Confucius and Fan Li worked and lived in different places and they took on different jobs all their life,so,it was impossible to have communications between them.Secondly,Fisherman and Fan Li had different Images and thoughts.Fisherman was a figure symbol that was fabricated by Chuang Tzu and a tool to express his thoughts or point of view.Taoist’affection for water and exiling of Chuang family can be used to expound the appearance of Fisherman.
出处
《学术界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期93-98,283-284,共6页
Academics
关键词
渔父
范蠡
虚构
水
fisherman
Fan Li
fabrication
water
