期刊文献+

互补原理视域下的不可通约性——兼谈科学革命中的连续性 被引量:1

Incommensurability in the Perspective of Complementary Principle——on continuity in scientific revolutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 库恩提出的"不可通约性"概念在一定程度上否定了科学革命前后的理论存在连续性。从近代光学发展过程可以看到科学革命中存在连续性,玻尔提出的互补原理也为理解科学革命提供了新的理论视角。若从互补原理的视角看待不可通约性,可以得到"不可通约性"是有其所适用的条件和基础的,对"不可通约性"也需要做出限制和改进,以使其适用于新的科学和哲学情境。 The concept of "incommensurability" presented by Kuhn denied the continuity between theories betore and atter the scten tifie revolution to some extent. But from the development process of modern optics we can see the continuity does exist in scientific revolution, and the Complementary Principle initiated by Bohr also gives us a new theoretical perspective in understanding it. Viewing the incommensurability from the perspective of Complementary Principle, we can see the concept of "incommensurability" has its conditions and basics. Also restrictions and improvements should be made on "incommensurability" to let it accommodate with the new scenario of science and philosophy.
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第2期26-30,共5页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 不可通约性 近代光学革命 互补原理 连续性 incommensurability revolution of modern optics complementary principle continuity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献12

  • 1(美)雅默(Jammer,M.)著,秦克诚.量子力学的哲学[M]商务印书馆,1989.
  • 2[英]贝弗里奇(Beveridge,W·I·B·) 著,金吾伦,李亚东.发现的种子[M]科学出版社,1987.
  • 3.
  • 4Kuhn.The Structure of Scientific Revolution[]..1970
  • 5N. R. Hanson.Pattern of Disconvery[]..1958
  • 6I. Scheffler.Science and Subjectivity[]..
  • 7Putnam.Reason,Truth,and History。[]..
  • 8Putnam.Reason, Truth, and History[]..
  • 9Kitcher."Theories, Theorists, and Theoretical Change, "[]..
  • 10.A Function for Thought Experiments[].Melanges Alexandre Koyre volL’aventure de la science.

共引文献36

同被引文献12

  • 1王祖陶.中国近代的化学教育[J].中国科技史杂志,1984,19(2):93-94. 被引量:2
  • 2Kuhn T S. The road since structure[M],Chicago : University of Chicago Press ,2000.
  • 3“relativism,,词条:http://plato.Stanford, edu/entries/relativism/#Rel(2015 -09 -11)[2015 - 9 -20].
  • 4Kuhn T S. The structureof scientific revolutions[M]. 3rd ed. Chicago:Universityof Chicago Press, 1996 : 148~ 150.
  • 5DavidA. Wells, Well?s Principles and Appli-cations of Chemistry? Ivison, Blakemen,Talor Press,1858.
  • 6Sankey Howard. Epistemic relativism and the problemof the criterion[J]. Studies in History and Philosophyof Science?2011(42) : 562 - 570.
  • 7Kuhn T S. The road since structure[M]. Chicago:Uni-versity of Chicago Press,2000.
  • 8Kuhn T S. Reflections on my critics[A]//Criticism andthe Growth of Knowledge (vol. 4) [M]. Imre Lakatos,Alan E Musgrave,Eds. Cambridge : Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1970:231 - 278.
  • 9Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M].3rd ed. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1996.
  • 10ZHONG Long一xi. The complexity of difference: indi-vidual, cultural, and cross - cutural[j], Interdivscipli-nary Science Reviews?2010(35) :341 - 352.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部