期刊文献+

自制激光碎石固定钳碎石效果的体外研究 被引量:1

In vitro lithotripsy experiment of a newly calculi anchoring forceps
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价一种自行设计的碎石固定钳在体外实验时的碎石效率。方法2010年10月选取结石替代品48颗,成分为碳酸钙,大致加工成椭圆形,质量0.5~0.7g,直径约1cm。随机分成两组,每组各24颗,第1组使用自制激光碎石固定钳,第2组不使用碎石固定钳,两组均采用钬激光碎石。在钬激光能量消耗2kJ时记录碎石时间及碎除结石质量,至彻底击碎结石后再记录碎石时间及消耗能量。比较两组碎石时间、消耗能量、残余结石的差异。结果钬激光能量消耗2kJ时碎石时间,第1组为(4.7±0.9)min,第2组为(4.2±0.9)min,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);能量消耗2kJ时所碎除结石质量第1组为(0.14±0.04)g,第2组为(0.13±0.06)g,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);剩余结石碎石时间第1组为(4.5±1.2)min,第2组为(9.2±2.6)min,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);剩余结石碎石消耗能量第1组为(1.7±0.5)kJ,第2组为(2.6±0.4)kJ,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);第1组总碎石时间为(9.2±1.7)min,总能量消耗为(3.7±0.5)kJ,第2组总碎石时间为(13.4±2.7)min,总能量消耗为(4.6±0.5)kJ,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论体外实验中,自制激光碎石固定钳能明显提高碎石效率,对于直径〈1cm结石的碎石效率提高更明显。 Objective To evaluate the lithotripsy efficiency of a newly calculi anchoring forceps in vitro. Methods Compared the efficiency with or without calculi anchoring forceps in the circumstances imitate percutaneous nephrolithotomy. There are 24 calculus for each group in random selection. The litho- tripsy was completed by one people, the time, energy and retained calculus were compared by T-test. Results When the energy expenditure reaches 2 k J, the operating time was (4.7 ± 0. 9) min in group 1 and (4.2 ± 0.9) rain in group 2 (P 〉 0. 05 ). The removal calculus showed no differences between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). After the energy used over 2 k J, the operating time of the remained calculus were (4.5 ± 1.2) min in group 1 and (9.2 ± 2.6) rain in group 2 respectively (P 〈 0.05 ) , and the energy con- sumed ( 1.7 ± 0. 5 ) kJ and (2.6 ± 0. 4) kJ respectively (P 〈 0.05 ). Total energy consumed in group 1 and group2 was (3.7±0.5) kJ and (4.6±0.5) kJ (P〈0.05). And the cumulate time used was (9.2± 1.7) min and (13.4±2.7) min in group 1 and group 2 respectively (P 〈0.05). Conclusions The calculi anchoring forceps can improve the efficiency of lithotripsy in vitro. The improvement was significant for the calculus whose diameter was smaller than 1cm.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期276-279,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 肾结石 膀胱结石 随机对照试验 Kidney calculi Urinary bladder calculi Randomized controlled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Denstedt JD, Razvi HA, Sales JL, et al. Preliminary experience with holmium : YAG laser lithotripsy. J Endourol, 1995, 9 : 255- 258.
  • 2Ahmed M, Pedro RN, Kieley S, et al. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migra- tion, and extraction. Urology, 2009, 73: 976-980.
  • 3Kesler SS, Pierre SA, Brison DI, et al. Use of the escape nitinol stone retrieval basket facilitates fragmentation and extraction of ureteral and renal calculi: a pilot study. J Endourol, 2008, 22: 1213-1217.
  • 4Rodrlguez GN, Fernandez GI, Pascual MC, et al. Stone Cone: a device that prevents ureteral stone migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Arch Esp Urol, 2005, 58: 329-334.
  • 5刘忠泽,李世俊,张福庆,苏运强,吴宪伟,薛健,朱勇,杨春生,姜文弟,肖汝涛,崔金花,季洁明.微创经皮肾镜取石术手术并发症分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(7):447-449. 被引量:140
  • 6Bastawisy M, Gameel T, Radwan M, et al. A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone mi- gration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol, 2011, 3: 203-210.
  • 7Maislos SD, Volpe M, Albert PS, et al. Efficacy of the Stone Cone for treatment of proximal ureteral stones. J Endourol, 2004, 18: 862-864.
  • 8Springhart WP, Tan YH, Albala DM, et al. Use of Stone Cone minimizes stone migration during pereutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology, 2006, 67: 1066-1068.
  • 9Garrido AP, Fernondez GI, Coloma DP, et al. Antimigration de- vices during endoscopic lithotripsy with holmium: yag laser. Arch Esp Urol, 2008, 61: 1115-1125.
  • 10Feng CC, Wu Z, Jiang HW, et al. A new stone occlusion device for upper ureteral calculi: preliminary clinical outcomes. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2012, 21 : 351-354.

二级参考文献13

  • 1杨江根,方烈奎,尹朝晖,黄东龙,李学朝,肖克峰,叶其伟.输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管结石(附789例报告)[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(6):597-599. 被引量:30
  • 2陈海戈,曹明,周立新,黄翼然.输尿管镜联合钬激光治疗输尿管上段结石[J].应用激光,2006,26(2):143-144. 被引量:5
  • 3黄宏,林美霞,唐华,陈剑,黄世勇.输尿管镜下套石网篮配合气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石[J].中国基层医药,2006,13(11):1817-1819. 被引量:12
  • 4Jiang H, Wu Z, Ding Q, et al . Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral calculi with Holmium : YAG laser lithot ripsy[J]. J Endourol, 2007,21 (2) : 151-154.
  • 5Desai M R, Patel S B, Desai M M,et al. The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migra- tionthe initial clinical experience[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167:1985-1988.
  • 6Marguet C G, Sung J C, Springhart W P, et al. In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmenta- tion of the freqtiency doubled, double pulse nd: yag laser and the holmium,yag laser[J]. J Urol , 2005, 173:1797-800.
  • 7Bagley D H, Slotoroff C B, Zeltser I S. Evolution of ureteroscopy from 1996 to 2004: comparison of indi- cations, endoscopes and instruments[J]. J Endourol, 2005,19(Suppl 1) :75.
  • 8Jackman SV,Docimo SG,Cadeddu JA,et al.The"mini-perc"technique:a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World J Urol,1998,16:371-374.
  • 9Lahme S,Bichler Kh,Strohmaier WL,et al.Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones.Eur Urol,2001,40:619-624.
  • 10Gremmo E,Ballanger P,Dore B,et al.Hemorrhagic complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Retrospective studies of 772 cases.Prog Urol,1999,9:460-463.

共引文献175

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部