期刊文献+

中国创业板IPO定价效率研究——基于双边随机前沿模型 被引量:7

Study of IPO Pricing Efficiency in Chinese GEM Market Based on Two-tier Stochastic Frontier Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在询价制下,创业板上市公司IPO发行价格由发行人、承销商、询价对象及投资者等多方共同决定。基于双边随机前沿模型考虑IPO定价过程中的折价效应和溢价效应,对创业板IPO定价效率进行度量,结果表明:在2009年10月30日~2012年6月30日期间,我国创业板上市公司IPO定价过程中存在折价效应和溢价效应,但折价效应大于溢价效应,即创业板IPO整体表现为发行折价。平均折价幅度为6.58%,折价幅度较小,表明国内创业板IPO定价效率较高;且平均折价水平呈下降趋势,即创业板IPO的定价效率不断提高。 Under an inquiry system,the IPO pricing of Chinese GEM Market is determined by the bargaining of issuers,underwriters,inquiry institutions,investors and other objects.The bargaining power of issuers and underwriters may make issuing prices below intrinsic value,and generate premium effects,while the pricing power of inquiry institutions and investors may let issuing prices over intrinsic value,and generate discount effects.This paper employs the two-tier stochastic frontier model to measure the IPO pricing efficiency of Chinese GEM Market.The results show that,both discount effect and premium effect exist in the IPO pricing of Chinese GEM Market,and the discount effect is larger than the premium effect,therefore,the whole GEM Market shows the discounting of issuing prices,with the average range of discount being 6.58%,which means the IPO pricing efficiency of Chinese GEM market is high,and remains on an upward trend.
作者 黄泽勇
出处 《广东商学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期21-29,共9页 Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
关键词 IPO定价 创业板 折价效应 溢价效应 双边随机前沿模型 CEM IPO pricing discount effect premium effect two-tier stochastic frontier model
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1STOLL H R, CURLEY A J. Small business and the new issues market for equities[ J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1970, 5(3) :309.
  • 2RITTER J R. The long-run performance of initial public offerings [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1991,46 ( 1 ) :3.
  • 3LOUGHRAN T, RITTER J R. The new issues puzzle[ J]. Journal of Finance, 1995,46 (1) :23.
  • 4BENVENISTE L M, SPINDT P A. How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues[ J ]. Journal of Financial E- conomics, 1989,24 ( 2 ) : 343.
  • 5LOWRY M ,SCHWERT G W. Is the IPO pricing process efficient? [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics ,2004,71( 1 ) :3.
  • 6PURNANANDAM A K, SWAMINATHAN B. Are IPOs really underpriced? [ J ]. Review of Financial Studies ,2004,17 (3) :811.
  • 7GAO Y. What comprises IPO initial returns:evidence from the Chinese market [ J ]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,2010,18 (1) :77.
  • 8ZHENG S X. Are IPOs really overpriced? [ J ]. Journal of Empirical Finance,2007,14 (3) :287.
  • 9HUNT-MCCOOL J, KOH S C, FRANCIS B B. Testing for deliberate underpricing in the IPO premarket :a stochastic frontier approach [ J ]. Review of Financial Studies, 1996,9 (4) : 1251.
  • 10邓召明.我国股票发行定价效率实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2001(6):60-64. 被引量:35

二级参考文献197

共引文献1091

同被引文献90

引证文献7

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部