期刊文献+

我国环境治理财政政策的效率研究——基于DEA交叉评价分析 被引量:12

A Study of the Efficiency of China’s Financial Policy for Environmental Governance:Based on DEA Cross Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 运用DEA交叉评价模型对我国环境治理财政政策的效率进行实证分析。结果表明:我国总体的环境治理效果并不理想,就各省市的规模效益而言,中西部地区的环境治理水平反而优于东部。进一步分析发现,我国环境治理财政政策在资金投入方面存在冗余现象,却又存在治理效率低下的问题,归根结底是由治理污染的技术局限性造成的。为了提高环境治理财政政策的效率,政府应当大规模实施高新技术改造,提高企业环境准入门槛,完善环境治理资金的有效配置,强化政府职能。 Based on DEA cross evaluation model, this paper makes an empirical study on the efficiency of China's financial policy for environmental governance. The results show that the effect of the environmental governance is not ideal in general. In terms of the scale merit of each province and city, the efficiency of the environmental governance of the central and western regions is higher than that in the eastern provinces. Further analysis reveals that redundant phenomenon exists in the capital investment of such financial policy, while at the same time there still exist the problem of low efficiency in environmental governance. After all, it is caused by the technical limitations of pollution control. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency of the financial policy for environmental governance, the government should carry out large-scale technical transformation, raise the environmental access threshold for enterprises, improve the effective allocation of environmental governance fund, and strengthen the government functions.
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期27-36,共10页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 上海市教委重点学科建设项目"经济系统运行与调控"(J50504) 上海市研究生创新基金(JWCXSL1002)
关键词 环境治理效率 财政政策效率 DEA交叉评价分析 规模效益 environmental governance efficiency financial policy efficiency DEA cross evaluation scale merit
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献35

  • 1陈富良.规制机制设计在环境政策中的应用评述[J].江西财经大学学报,2005(1):5-8. 被引量:9
  • 2包群,彭水军.经济增长与环境污染:基于面板数据的联立方程估计[J].世界经济,2006,29(11):48-58. 被引量:310
  • 3吴舜泽,陈斌,逯元堂,王金南,张治忠.中国环境保护投资失真问题分析与建议[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(3):112-117. 被引量:62
  • 4Fre R,Grosskopf S,Lovell C A K,Pasurka C.Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable:a nonparametric approach[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,1989,71(1):90-98.
  • 5Haynes K E,Ratuck S,Cummings-sexton J.Pollution prevention frontiers:a data envelopment simulation[M].Boston:University of Illinois Press,1997:115-118.
  • 6Reinhard S,Lovell C A K,Thijssen G J.Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables:estimated with SFA and DEA[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2000,121(2):287-303.
  • 7Hailu A,Veeman T S.Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs:an application to the canadian pulp and paper industry[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2001,83(3):605-616.
  • 8Chung Y H,Fre R,Groddkopf S.Productivity and undesirable outputs:a directional distance function approach[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1997,51(9):229-240.
  • 9Zhou P,Ang B W,Poh K L.Slack-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance[J].Ecological Economics,2006,60(11):111-118.
  • 10Zhou P,Kim Poh L,Ang B W.A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2007,187(1):1-9.

共引文献163

同被引文献218

引证文献12

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部