期刊文献+

中国证券市场预期特质性波动率影响定价的实证研究 被引量:6

An Empirical Study of Pricing Impact of the Expected Idiosyncratic Volatility in China’s Securities Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于1997年1月至2011年9月沪深两市非金融类A股数据对中国证券市场预期特质性波动率和股票收益率之间关系的考察,发现中国证券市场预期特质性波动率和股票收益率之间呈负相关关系;但当控制住换手率、Amihud非流动性比率、机构投资者持股比例和分析师覆盖等投资者意见分歧的代理变量后,这一关系转变为正相关关系。据此,支持二者负相关的Miller模型和支持二者正相关的Merton模型都刻画了中国证券市场的运行状况,但市场表现出何种规律取决于哪一个模型的影响居于主导地位。 On the basis of the data of non-financial A-shares listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges for the period of January, 1997 to September, 2011, this paper examines the relationship between the expected idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns in China's securities markets. It is revealed that there exists a negative correlation between the expected idiosyncratic volatility and the stock returns; but this negative correlation will turn positive after controlling the proxy variables that investors have different opinions, such as the turnover rate, the Amihud illiquidity ratio, the shareholding ratio of the institutional investors and analyst coverage. Hence, this paper concludes that both the Miller model which supports a negative correlation between expected idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns and the Merton model which supports a positive one can describe the operation of China's securities markets, but the final result is determined by the impact of the model that takes the dominating role in the market.
作者 张宇飞 马明
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期59-72,共14页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"外汇套利项目的矩阵分析法"(70871012) 中国人民大学科学研究基金项目(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)"中国证券市场的异质性风险研究"(12XNH008)
关键词 特质性波动率 超额收益率 Miller模型 MERTON模型 idiosyncratic volatility excess return Miller Model Merton Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Grossman, $. J., Stiglltz, J. E. On the Impossibility of Informafionally Efficient Markets[J]. The American Economic Review, 1980, 70(6): 393-408.
  • 2Merton, R. C. A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1987, 42(3): 483-510.
  • 3Campbell, J. Y., Lettau, M., Malkiel, B. G., Xu, Y. Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Ex- ploration of Idiosyncratic Risk[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2001, 56(2): 1-43.
  • 4Miller, E. M. Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinion[J]. The Journal of finance, 1977, 32(4): 1151-1168.
  • 5Boehme, R. D., Danielsen, B. R., Kumar, P., Sorescu, S. M. Idiosyncratic Risk and the Cross-section of Stock Re- turns: Melton (1987) Meets Miller (1977) [J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2009, 12(3): 438-468.
  • 6Goetzmann, W. N., Kumar, A. Equity Portfolio Diversification[J]. Review of Finance, 2008, 12(3): 433-463.
  • 7Statman, M. The Diversification Puzzle[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2004, 60(8): 44-53.
  • 8Bloomfield, T., Loftwich, R., Long, J. B. Portfolio Strategies and Performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1977, 5(2): 201-218.
  • 9Statman, M. How Many Stocks Make a Diversified Porffolio?[J]. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1987, 22(9): 353-363.
  • 10Levy, H. Equilibrium in an Imperfect Market: A Constraint on the Number of Securities in the Portfolio[J]. The American Economic Review, 1978, 68(4): 643-658.

二级参考文献154

共引文献569

同被引文献83

引证文献6

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部