期刊文献+

复杂性输尿管上段结石不同术式的疗效对比 被引量:10

Comparison of therapeutic effect among three minimally invasive surgical treatments for complicated upper ureteral calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比3种微创术式治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2006年8月至2012年10月324例复杂性输尿管上段结石患者的临床资料,其中192例行经尿道输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术(transurethral ureteroscopic litho-tripsy,URL),38例行微创经皮肾输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术(minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy,MPCNL),94例行腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术(retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy,RLU)。结果:MPCNL组并发症发生率明显高于其他两组;住院时间URL组明显少于其他两组;术后1个月拔除双J管后复查B超及静脉尿路造影,结石清除率URL组明显低于其他两组。结论:URL、RLU及MPCNL处理复杂性输尿管上端结石各有利弊,MPCNL及RLU具有较高的结石清除率,并发症发生率及住院时间URL明显少于其他两种术式。 Objective:To compare the efficacy of three minimally invasive surgical treatments for complicated upper ureteral calculi. Methods:The clinical data of the 324 patients who had complicated upper ureteral calculi from Aug. 2006 to Oct. 2012 were retrospectively analyzed, 192 of them received transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) ,38 underwent minimally invasive percuta- neous nephrolithotomy ( MPCNL), and 94 retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU). The treatment resuhs of the three kinds of surgical operations were comparatively analyzed. Results : The complication rate of MPCNL was significantly higher than that of the other two groups. The length of hospital stay in the URL group was significantly shorter than that in the other two groups. The double-J tube was removed one month later, stone-free rate of URL was significantly lower than the other two groups, which was proved by B ul- trasound and intravenous urography. Conclusions:URL, RLU and MPCNL have their virtues and faults in managing complicated upper ureteral calculi. MPCNL and RLU have higher stone-free rate, while URL has advantages in complication rate and length of hospital stay.
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2013年第2期137-139,共3页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 输尿管结石 腹腔镜检查 腹膜后路径 输尿管镜检查 肾造口术 经皮 Ureteral calculi Laparoscopy Retroperitoneal approach Ureteroscopy Nephrostomy, percutaneous
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献29

共引文献595

同被引文献83

  • 1郑珉,陈寅,陈轶欣,黄亚胜,虞旗旗.腹腔镜手术治疗鹿角形肾结石33例临床报告[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2011,35(5):691-693. 被引量:8
  • 2刘齐贵,麻伟青,周庆余,窦坤,王跃力,姚建忠,郭云丽,吉庆华,熊德顺.尿路结石及合并病的腔内钬激光手术治疗[J].中国误诊学杂志,2005,5(7):1277-1278. 被引量:9
  • 3孙颖浩,王林辉,许传亮,高旭,高小峰.末端可弯型输尿管镜治疗肾盏结石的初步体会[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(11):743-745. 被引量:14
  • 4黄锦坤,李逊,吴开俊,袁坚,罗金泰.3种不同术式治疗复杂输尿管上段结石的疗效比较——随机对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(2):103-105. 被引量:123
  • 5Lee Y H, Tsai J Y, Jiaan B P, et al. Prospective ran- domized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ure- teroscopie lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteralstones[J]. Urology, 2006, 67(5) 480- 484.
  • 6Hammady A, Gamal W M, Zaki M, et al. Evaluation of ureteraI stent placement after retroperitoneal laparo- scopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral stone: ran- domized controlled study[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25 (5) : 825-830.
  • 7Yimaz E,Batislam E,Basar MM,et al.The comparison and efficacy of 3 different alphal-adrenergic blockers for distal ureteral stones[J].J Urol,2005,173(6):2010-2012.
  • 8Buscarini M,Conlin M.Update on flexible urteroscopy[J].Urol Int,2008,80(1):1-7.
  • 9Deirmenci T,Gunlusoy B,Kozaciogluz,et al.Outcomes of ureteroscopy for the management of impacted ureteral calculi with different localizations[J].Urology,2012,80(4):811-815.
  • 10Zhu H, Ye X, Xiao X, et al. Retograde, antegrade, and lamscopic apmaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure : a four - year retospective study [ J ]. Joumal Of Endoumlogyr,2014 ,28 ( 1 ) : 100 - 103.

引证文献10

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部