期刊文献+

轴心受压格构式缀板与缀条柱选型对比研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study on Selection of Batten plate and Lace Bar Lattice Columns under Axial Compression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过大量算例对比分析了轴心受压缀板柱与缀条柱满足实轴、虚轴稳定条件下的格构柱最小用钢量,并得出两种构件的稳定经济性适用条件。推导出缀板柱与缀条柱在轴心受压下格构柱最小用钢量的计算公式。以分肢截面,分肢间距,实轴与虚轴计算长度,缀板尺寸与间距,轴心压力,缀条截面与布置角度为变化参数,得到两种格构柱的最小用钢量。上述研究结论可为工程设计提供参考。 The minimum amount of the steel between the batten plate and lace bar lattice columns under axial compres- sion in the stability conditions of both strong and weak axis is compared and analyzed through a large number of exam- ples, and the stable economic conditions for the application of two components are obtained. The formulas in the mini- mum amount of two kinds of steel columns under axial compression are derived. The section and spacing of double limbs, the effective lengths of both strong and weak axis, the size and spacing of batten plate, axial pressure, as well as the sec- tion and assigned angle of lace bar are taken as variable parameters so as to obtain the minimum steel consumption of two lattice columns. All these as mentioned above could provide some references for the engineering design of lattice columns.
作者 谭欣 潘雨辰
出处 《水利与建筑工程学报》 2013年第2期27-31,共5页 Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering
关键词 格构柱用钢量对比 轴心压力影响 长细比影响 边界条件拟合插值 steel-consumption comparison of lattice column influence of axial compression influence of slender- ness ratio fitting interpolation of boundary condition
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献65

  • 1陈宝春,欧智菁.四肢钢管混凝土格构柱极限承载力试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(6):32-41. 被引量:39
  • 2[1]Kim S. E. and Chen W. F. Practical advanced analysis for braced steel frame design. J. Struct. Engrg. , ASCE, 122(11),1996,1266-1274
  • 3[2]Kim S. E. and Chen W. F. Practical advanced analysis for unbraced steel frame design. J. Struct. Engrg. , ASCE, 122(11) ,1996,1259-1265
  • 4[3]Landesmann A. and Batista E. Advanced analysis of frame steel structures: towards application as a current design tool.Proceedings, 2002 Annual Stability Conference SSRC, 551-570
  • 5[4]Buonopane S. G. , et al. Reliability considerations for steel frames designed with advanced analysis: Proceedings, 2003Annual Technical Session. SSRC, 299-318
  • 6[5]Deierlein G. G. ,et al. Proposed new provisions for frame stability using second-order analysis. Proceedings,2002 Annual Stability Conference SSRC, 1-20
  • 7[6]Clarke M.J. and Bridge RQ. Application of the notional load approach to the design of multistory steel frames. Proceed ings, 1995 Annual Technical Session SSRC, 191-211
  • 8[7]ASCE Task Committee. Effective length and notional load ap proaches for assessing frame stability: Implications for American steel design. New York,1997
  • 9[8]DeLuca A,and De Stefano M. Proposal for introduction of equivalent frame imperfections into Eurocode 3 provisions.Proceedings, 1994 Annual Technical Session SSRC,457-466
  • 10[11]Bridge R.Q. and Fraser O.J. Improved G-factor method for evaluating effective lengths of columns. J. Struct. Engrg. ,ASCE,113(6) ,1987,1341-1356

共引文献302

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部