摘要
我国《物权法》第24条规定机动车的物权变动模式为登记对抗主义,其中交付是生效要件,登记是对抗要件。但是,机动车采登记对抗主义的立法理由不具有说服力,该模式在理论上难以自圆其说,实践中也产生很多问题。相比之下,交付生效模式更具有优越性,也符合大陆法系主要国家对机动车物权变动模式的规定。因此,我国机动车的物权变动模式应当予以变革,将登记对抗模式转变为交付生效模式。
According to article 24 of Property Law, the property right of motor vehicle is transferred from the time of delivery, and there is no defense if the motor vehicle is not registered. However, this is irrational. Firstly, there are no reasonable legislative reasons to do so. Secondly, there are also significant deficiencies in the pattern of motor vehicle's transferred both in theory and practice. In contrast, the pattern of delivery has more advantages. In order to overcome the defects and to be consistent with oth- er countries about the pattern of motor vehicles' transfer, the pattern needs changing from registration mode to delivery mode.
出处
《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》
2013年第2期20-24,共5页
Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
关键词
机动车
物权变动模式
登记对抗主义
交付生效主义
motor vehicle
pattern of property transfer
legal force of property registration
effective transfer upon delivery