期刊文献+

重型颅脑损伤应用双侧去骨瓣减压术治疗的临床研究 被引量:9

Clinical research of applying bilateral decompressive craniectomy for severe craniocerebral injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究双侧去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效和预后。方法在本院收治的患者中,抽取60例重型颅脑损伤者,随机分成两组,每组30例,对照组30例患者采用标准单侧大骨瓣减压,治疗组患者采用双侧去骨瓣减压术进行治疗,比较两组患者的疗效以及预后。结果治疗组有效率(93.3%)优于对照组(76.6%),两组治疗前后的GCS评分比较,治疗组[治疗前(3.67±0.54)分,治疗后(8.86±0.64)分]的改善情况优于对照组[治疗前(3.85±0.43)分,治疗后(6.13±0.72)分],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论双侧去骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤的效果较好,值得有条件的医院推广使用。 Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect and prognosis of applying bilateral decompressive craniecto- my for severe craniocerebral injury. Methods Sixty patients with severe craniecerebral injury treated in our hospital were selected and randomly assigned into two groups, 30 cases in each group. The 30 patients in control group were treated by standard unilateral decompressive eraniectomy, while the patients in treatment group were given bilateral decompressive craniectomy. The therapeutic effect and prognosis of both groups were compared. Results The therapeu- tic effect of treatment group (93.3%) was better than that of control group (76.6%). As to the comparison of GCS score of both groups before and after treatment, the improvement of treatment group [before treatment (3.67±0.54) scores, af- ter treatment (8.86±0.64) scores] was superior to that of control group [before treatment (3.8.5±0.43) scores, after treat- ment (6.13±0.72) scores] with statistical difference (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion For severe eraniocerebral injury, bilateral decompressive craniectomy has better effect and worth widely applying in hospitals with corresponding condition.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2013年第12期78-79,共2页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 双侧去骨瓣减压 重型颅脑损伤 疗效 GCS评分 Bilateral decompressive craniectomy Severe craniocerebral injury Therapeutic effect C_,CS score
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献38

  • 1李建亭,李天栋,白红民,蒋晓星,刘一兵,高寒,王玉宝,王国良,王伟民.双侧平衡去骨瓣减压术治疗重型闭合性颅脑损伤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2006,11(2):65-67. 被引量:77
  • 2刘泽洪,林俊杰,张晓云,赖晓亮,朱雷友.重型颅脑损伤开颅术中急性脑膨出防治策略[J].浙江创伤外科,2007,12(4):340-341. 被引量:5
  • 3CHOI I,PARK H K.Clinical factors for the development of postt-raumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy[J].JKorean Neurosury Soc,2008,3(5):227-231.
  • 4DOPPENBERG E M,CHOI S C,BULLOCK R.Clinical trials intraumatic brain injury:lessons for the future[J].J NeurosurgAnesthesiol,2004,16(1):87-94.
  • 5ENGELHARD K,MULLER FORELL W,WERNER C.Therapyof head trauma[J].Anaesthesist,2008,57(12):1219-1231.
  • 6TUETTENBREG J,CZABANKA M,HORN P,et al.Clinical e-valuation of the safty and efficacy of lumbar cerebrospinal fluiddrainage for the treatment of refractory increased intracranial pres-sure[J].J Neurosurg,2009,110(6):1200-1208.
  • 7JIANG J Y,XU W,LI W P,et al.Efficacy of standard traumacraniectomy for refractory in-Tracranial hepertension with severetraumatic brain injury:a multicenter,prospective,ran-Domizedcontrolled study[J].J Neurotrauma,2005,2(6):623-628.
  • 8Miller JD, Becker DP, Ward JD, et al. Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury [J]. J Neurosurg, 1977, 47(4): 503-516.
  • 9Lucia M, Bchir MB, Ivan T, et al. The Surgical Approach to the Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure After Trau- matic Brain Injury[J]. Surg Neurol, 2010,111(3):736-747.
  • 10罗其中,钟春龙.刘百运.颅脑创伤患者的手术指征//江基尧,朱诚,罗其中.颅脑创伤临床救治指南[M].第三版.上海:第二军医大学出版社.2007:24-27.

共引文献44

同被引文献80

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部