期刊文献+

以“英语写作”为例解析国家精品课程建设关注要点 被引量:3

Points of Concern for the Excellent Course Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1999年以来,随着招生规模的不断扩大,我国高等教育所面临的问题也不断增加。如何全面提高高等教育质量的问题首当其冲,引起了国家与社会的普遍关注。为了缓解这个问题,新世纪以来,教育部通过"质量工程"的实施,加强了高校精品课程的建设工作,取得了良好的效果。2012年秋季,新一轮的国家精品开放课程的申报工作正式开始。"优化结构,转型升级"是这次精品课程建设的指导思想之一。根据这一指导思想,结合国家精品课程"英语写作(1~4级水平)"的建设工作,作者采用了问题化与解构式的讨论模式,从8个方面入手,总结了40个"关注要点",为精品课程的建设提供一种发展思路。 Since the year of 1999, the higher education in China has witnessed two changes: a dramatic increase of student population and a rapid decrease of teaching quality. To deal with these problems, new policies and measurements have been taken, one of which is the Program of National Excellent Courses. Encouraged by its initial achievements, this program is currently resumed. One of the principles advocated by the new program is form transformation and quality enhancement". Guided by this principle and being participants of this program, we took a problematic plus deconstructive discourse pattern and summarized 40 points of concern in this work. By doing so, we wanted to provide a new approach to developing excellent courses in general and improving the quality of English writing classes at the tertiary level in particular.
作者 杨永林 丁韬
机构地区 清华大学外文系
出处 《现代教育技术》 CSSCI 2013年第4期72-75,共4页 Modern Educational Technology
关键词 精品课程 关注要点 英语写作 自动评改 quality course points of concern English writing automated scoring and feedback systems
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1教育部、财政部.关于“十二五”期间实施“高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革工程”的意见[Z].北京,2011.
  • 2教育部.关于国家精品开放课程建设的实施意见[Z].2011.
  • 3教育部办公厅.关于印发《精品资源共享课建设工作实施办法》的通知[Z].教高厅[2012]2号,2012-05-21.
  • 4教育部高等教育司.关于开展2012年国家级精品资源共享课推荐工作的通知北京,2012.
  • 5Bitchener,J. & U. Knoch. The contribution of writtencorrective feedback to language development: A ten monthinvestigation [J], Applied Linguistics,2010,(2): 193-214.
  • 6Sheen, Y. The role of oral and written corrective feedback inSLA. Language Learning [J]. 2010, (2): 169-179 .
  • 7Xi,Xiaoming. Automated scoring and feedback systems:Where are we and where are we heading? [J] LanguageTesting,2010,(3): 291-300.
  • 8Stem, L.A. & A. Solomon. Effective faculty feedback: Theroad less traveled. Assessing Writing[J]. 2006,(11): 22-41.
  • 9TuziF. The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2writers in an academic writing course. Computers andComposition [J]. 2004,(2): 217-235.

共引文献18

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部