期刊文献+

概念转喻与话语连贯程度研究

On Conceptual Metonymy and Cohesive Force in Discourse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概念转喻作为人们说话、行为、思想的一种方式越来越受到学界的重视。本研究以Lakoff和Radden&Kovecses的研究为基础,旨在探讨话语中不同类型转喻对话语连贯的作用及其操作机制,并通过分析,阐释了转喻本体与喻体之间概念距离的大小与衔接力强弱和话语的连贯程度高低的关系。 As a way to speak, act and think, the study of metonymy has received a lot of attention. On the basis of studies by Lakoff and Radden & Kovecses, this paper attempts to discuss the degrees of coherence of different categories of metonymies. In addition, this research makes an analysis of why different categories of metonymies make different degrees of coherent discourses. Through re- searches, the conclusion is drawn that the more distant the two conceptual entities are, the weaker discourse coherence is while the less distant the two conceptual entities are, the stronger discourse coherence is.
作者 董涛
出处 《齐鲁师范学院学报》 2013年第2期130-133,共4页 Journal of Qilu Normal University
关键词 概念转喻 相关关系 突显性 连贯程度 Conceptual metonymy Cohesive force Contiguity Coherence
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1上海外语教育出版社2004年出版的《外国语》(上海外国语大学学报)第6期.Metonymg in Gram-mar-文,作者 Ronald W. Langacker..
  • 2Halliday,M. A. K. & R. Hasan. Cohesion in English[M]. Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and ResearchPress,2001.
  • 3王寅.语篇连贯的认知世界分析方法——体验哲学和认知语言学对语篇连贯性的解释[J].外语学刊,2005(4):16-23. 被引量:110
  • 4Dirven,R. Conversion as a Conceptual Metonymy of E-vent Schemata[ C] . In Klaus - Uwe Panther & G. Rad-den ( eds. ) . Metonymy in Language and Thought. Am-sterdam & Philadelphia : John Benjamins PublishingCompany, 1999.
  • 5王寅,李弘.体验哲学和认知语言学对词汇和词法成因的解释[J].外语学刊,2004(2):1-6. 被引量:85
  • 6Al - Sharafi, A. G. M. Textual Metonymy: A SemioticApproach [ M]. Hampshire & New York:Palgrave Mac-millan, 2004.
  • 7Lakoff,G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live by[ M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 8Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: WhatCategories Reveal About the mind[ M] . Chicago & Lon-don :The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 9Panthe, Klaus - Uwe & G. Radden. Metonymy in Lan-guage and Thought [ M]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia :John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999.
  • 10Radden, G. & Z. Kovecses. Towards a Theory of Me-tonymy [C]. In Panther, Klaus - Uwe & G. Radden(ed. ). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam& Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company,1999.

二级参考文献52

  • 1沈家煊.“有界”与“无界”[J].中国语文,1995(5):367-380. 被引量:974
  • 2胡壮麟.语法隐喻[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(4):1-7. 被引量:332
  • 3王寅.认知语言学的哲学基础:体验哲学[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(2):82-89. 被引量:422
  • 4Herder J G 姚小平译.论语言的起源[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.1772.
  • 5陈平.汉语零形回指的话语分析[J].中国语文,1987,(5):363-378.
  • 6马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[A]..马克思恩格斯全集:第42卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1979..
  • 7朱永生.语言·语篇·语境[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1993..
  • 8Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis[M]. CUP.
  • 9Cook, Guy. 1994. Discourse and Literature[M]. OUP.
  • 10Deane, P. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax[M]. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.

共引文献192

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部