期刊文献+

一种典型翼型在湍流模型中的数值仿真分析 被引量:2

Numerical Simulation Analysis of Typical Profile in Turbulence Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前飞行器的气动设计主要以风洞实验和数值计算为主要手段。但是风洞实验的周期长、成本高。为提高设计性能,提出选取计算流体力学作为研究方法,并通过选用SST、k-ω和k-ε湍流模型对典型RAE2822翼型进行数值仿真,与风洞实验结果用图和表的形式进行比较,并分析仿真结果,对数值计算方法进行精度确认。结果表明所采用的计算流体力学在SST湍流模型的计算精度高,且满足计算要求,可以进一步为飞行器气动数值计算分析提供可靠的方法基础,进而为飞行器的设计工作打下了基础。 At present, the flight vehicle aerodynamic design takes wind tunnel test and numerical calculation as the main means. But wind tunnel experimental cycle is long, and the cost is high. This paper put forward the compu- tational fluid mechanics as the research method, and through the selection of SST, k - toand k - eturbulence model for numerical simulation with typical RAE2822 profile, and compared with wind tunnel experimental results using pic- tures and tables. The analysis of the simulation results was carried out and the accuracy of the numerical calculation method was confirmed. The results have shown that the use of computational fluid mechanics in the SST turbulence model is of high calculation precision, and it can meet the requirements and be further calculated for vehicle aerody- namic numerical calculation and analysis to provide reliable method for foundation.
出处 《计算机仿真》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期116-119,141,共5页 Computer Simulation
关键词 飞行器 计算流体力学 翼型 湍流模型 : Flight vehicle Computational fluid dynamics Profile Turbulence model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1胡志强,林扬,谷海涛.水下机器人粘性类水动力数值计算方法研究[J].机器人,2007,29(2):145-150. 被引量:38
  • 2F R Menter. Zonal Two Equation k - to Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows [ R ]. AIAA 93 -2906, 1993.
  • 3P H Cook, M A McDonald, M C P Firmin. Aerofoil RAE 2822 Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake.Measurements, Experimental Data Base for Computer Program As- sessment[ R]. AGARD Report AR 138, 1979.
  • 4约翰D安德森.汁锋流体力学基础及其应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007-6.
  • 5邓小刚,宗文刚,张来平,高树椿,李超.计算流体力学中的验证与确认[J].力学进展,2007,37(2):279-288. 被引量:67

二级参考文献20

  • 1Metha U B.Guide to credible computational fluid dynamics simulations.AIAA-95-2225,1995
  • 2Roache P J.Verification of codes and calculations.AIAA Journal,1998,36(5):696~702
  • 3Schlesinger S.Terminology for model credibility.Simulation,1979,32(3):103~104
  • 4Harten A,Engquist B,Osher S,et al.Uniformly high-order accurate essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes Ⅲ.J of Comp Phys,1987,71:231~323
  • 5Shu C,Osher S.Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes.J of Comp Phys,1988,77:439~471
  • 6Roache P J,Knupp P,Steinberg S,et al.Experience with benchmark test cases for groundwater flow.In:Celik I,Freitas C J,eds.Benchmark Test Cases for Computational Fluid Dynamics,FED-vol.93.New York:The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,1990.49~56
  • 7Roache P J.Code verification by the method of manufactured solutions.ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering,2002,114(1):4~10
  • 8Roache P J.Need for control of numerical accuracy.Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets,1990,27(2):98~102
  • 9Rizzi J V.Toward establishing credibility in computational fluid dynamics simulations.AIAA Journal,1998,36(5):668~675
  • 10Oberkampf W L,Trucano T G.Validation methodology in computational fluid dynamics.AIAA-2000-2549,2000

共引文献103

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部