期刊文献+

碳价格对低碳基荷发电技术相对竞争力的影响评估 被引量:1

Impact of Carbon Pricing on Relative Competitiveness of Low-carbon Base Load Power Generation Technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据国际能源机构(IEA)的评估标准选出合适的低碳基荷发电技术,分析了引入碳价格后发电成本和温室气体排放强度的变动情况,并研究碳定价机制对各发电技术相对竞争力的影响。结果表明,核电成本的排放量最低,竞争优势最大;太阳能热利用成本的排放量最高,相对竞争力最小。目前依靠碳捕捉与封存技术(CCS)的传统煤粉蒸汽锅炉发电(PFcoal/CCS)、联合循环发电系统(IGCC/CCS)、联合循环燃气涡轮(CCGT/CCS)技术是有风险的策略。 This article selects the reasonable base load power generation technology based on the criteria of the Inter- national Energy Agency (lEA), analyzes the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and greenhouse gas emissions intensity (EI) by introducing carbon pricing, and further studies the impact of the carbon pricing mechanism on the relative corn petitiveness ok power generation technologies. The results show that among all selected technology, the nuclear power, with the lowest cost and emissions, has the greatest competitive advantage; the solar thermal, with the highest cost and emissions, has the smallest relative competitiveness; in addition, there is a certain risk to develop the pulverized fuel (PF), integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) technology combined with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology in the current development stage.
出处 《水电能源科学》 北大核心 2013年第4期226-228,244,共4页 Water Resources and Power
关键词 碳价格 低碳基荷发电技术 平准化发电成本 温室气体排放强度 相对竞争力 carbon pricing low-carbon base load power generation technology levelized cost of electricity greenhouse gas emissions intensity~ relative competitiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献21

  • 1温鸿钧.核电与煤电的外部成本比较及对策研究[J].核科学与工程,2005,25(2):97-105. 被引量:16
  • 2侯勇,张荣乾,谭忠富,王成文,曹福成.基于模糊聚类和灰色理论的各行业与全社会用电量关联分析[J].电网技术,2006,30(2):46-50. 被引量:26
  • 3魏一鸣等.中国碳能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:58-65.
  • 4TARJANNE R & RISSANEN S. Nuclear Power:. Least-Cost Option for Baseload Electricity in Finland. The Uranium Institute 25th Annual Symposium 30 August-1 September 2000, London.1-16.
  • 5Grubb,M., Neuhoff, K..Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme:policy overview[J].2006(6).
  • 6Benz & Truck.Modeling the price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances[J].Energy Economics,2008,16(7).
  • 7Wood, P.J. and Jotzo, F.Price floors for emissions trading[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(3).
  • 8索尼亚.拉巴特,罗德尼.R.怀特.碳金融:碳减排良方还是金融陷阱[M].石油工业出版社,2010.
  • 9中国国家发展和改革委员会.中国应对气候变化国家方案[R].2007.
  • 10张意翔,王红兵,汪涛.工业重化工化对我国能源消费影响的实证分析[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2008,8(1):26-31. 被引量:6

共引文献26

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部