期刊文献+

0.8设计系数下天然气管道用焊管关键性能指标 被引量:11

Key performance indicators of welded pipe for natural gas pipeline with design factor of 0.8
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究了0.8设计系数下天然气管道用焊管满足断裂控制要求的母材和焊缝韧性指标,评估了钢管100%SMYS水压试验的可行性。对于采用0.8设计系数、直径1219mm、设计压力12MPa的天然气管道,为防止钢管启裂,要求焊缝夏比冲击韧性最小平均值为80J;为满足管道止裂要求,要求钢管母材夏比冲击韧性最小平均值为260J。对管径为1219mm的X80钢管批量生产屈服强度数据的统计分析和评估结果表明:X80钢管进行100%SMYS工厂水压试验是可行的,但需要优选板材和钢管性能稳定的供货商,并严格进行水压试验后的钢管几何尺寸检测。(表4,图5,参6) Base metal and weld toughness indicator of welded pipe for natural gas pipeline meeting fracture control requirements under the design factor of 0.8 is studied and feasibility of 100% SMYS hydrostatic test for steel pipe is assessed. For the natural gas pipeline with the design factor of 0.8, diameter of 1 219 mm and design pressure of 12 MPa, it is required to reach 80 J of minimum Charpy impact toughness for welding seam to prevent crack initiation. In order to meet pipeline crack arrest requirements, it is required to reach 260 J of minimum Charpy impact toughness for steel. As shown from statistical analysis and assessment results of yield strength data for 1 219 mm X80 steel pipe in mass production, 100% SMYS factory hydrostatic test of X80 steel pipe is feasible, but it is required to select the supplier with stable performance of plate and steel pipe and strictly detect geometric dimensions of steel pipe after the hydrostatic test. (4 Tables, 5 Figures, 6 References)
出处 《油气储运》 CAS 2013年第4期355-359,共5页 Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
基金 中国石油天然气集团公司重点应用基础研究项目"油气管道完整性评价基础理论及方法研究" 07A40401 中国石油天然气集团公司重大科技专项"第三代大输量天然气管道工程关键技术研究" 2012E-28
关键词 天然气管道 0 8设计系数 韧性指标 工厂水压试验 natural gas pipeline, design factor of 0.8, toughness indicator, factory hydrostatic test
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献57

  • 1李鹤林.油气输送钢管的发展动向与展望[J].焊管,2004,27(6):1-11. 被引量:123
  • 2赵新伟,罗金恒,李鹤林,杨龙.油气输送用焊接钢管可靠性评估方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(9):7-10. 被引量:9
  • 3赵新伟,李鹤林,罗金恒,霍春勇,冯耀荣.油气管道完整性管理技术及其进展[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(1):129-135. 被引量:98
  • 4Luo Jinheng, Zhao Xinwei, Xiong Qingren, et al. Defective Pipeline Fatigue-life Prediction using Fatigue Assessment Diagram Technique. The Proceedings of IPC2004[C]. Calgary, Canada, 2004.
  • 5Maxey, W A, Kiefner, J F, Eiber R J, et al. Ductile Fracture Initiation, Propagation and Arrest in Cylindrical Vessels. Fracture Toughness[R]. ASIM STP514. Philadelphia:ASIM, 1972 : 70 - 81.
  • 6NSI/ASME B31G:Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines[S], 1991.
  • 7CAN/EBA Z184 - M86 - 1986 Gas Pipeline Systems[S].Ottawa.CSA, 1986.
  • 8DNV RP F101 - 1999 Corroded Pipelines[S]. Oslo. DNV, 1999.
  • 9API 579.Recommended Practice for Fitness-for-service[S], 2000.
  • 10Kumar V, German M D, Shih C F. An Engineering Approach for Elastic-plastic Fracture Analysis[R].EPRI NP- 193. Palo Alto. EPRI, 1981.

共引文献172

同被引文献133

引证文献11

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部