期刊文献+

连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过对急性肾损伤患者胱抑素C浓度的影响 被引量:7

The effect of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury on the serum levels of urea,creatinine and cystatin C
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)置换剂量和持续时间对急性肾损伤(AKI)患者胱抑素C(CysC)浓度的影响。方法:将AKI伴少尿需行肾脏替代治疗患者纳入研究,予CVVH连续治疗24h以上,根据病情设定置换剂量分别为2L/h或4L/h。于CVVH治疗前及治疗第4、12、24小时抽取滤器前血液,第4小时抽取滤器后血液及超滤液,检测常用肾功能指标即尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐(SCr)和CysC的浓度。比较不同置换剂量和治疗时间点上述各指标的下降率,并计算滤器清除率和浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:共纳入15例患者,其中2L/h剂量组7例,4L/h剂量组8例,两组间年龄构成、性别比例均无差异。CVVH治疗前2L/h剂量组BUN、SCr浓度均低于4L/h剂量组(P<0.05),CysC浓度差异无统计学意义。2L/h剂量组CVVH治疗第4、12、24小时滤器前BUN浓度较治疗前分别平均下降13.7%、43.0%、49.5%;SCr浓度分别平均下降12.7%、28.1%、54.5%;CysC浓度分别平均下降8.0%、23.0%、29.3%。CysC浓度下降率均低于同期BUN、SCr浓度下降率(P均<0.05)。2L/h剂量组BUN、SCr和CysC中位清除率分别为23.0ml/min、26.8ml/min和10.4ml/min,AUC分别为0.306mg/(L.h),0.252mg/(L.h),和0.190mg/(L.h)。4L/h剂量组CVVH治疗第4、12、24小时滤器前BUN浓度较治疗前分别平均下降12.3%、33.4%、56.5%,SCr浓度分别平均下降14.5%、29.4%、49.6%,CysC浓度分别平均下降10.2%、17.6%、29.7%。第12和24小时CysC浓度下降率均低于同期BUN、SCr浓度下降率(P均<0.05)。4L/h剂量组对BUN、SCr和CysC中位清除率分别为46.3ml/min、41.8ml/min和21.7ml/min,AUC分别为0.271mg/(L.h)、0.216mg/(L.h)和0.310mg/(L.h)。结论:CVVH置换剂量和持续时间对AKI患者的CysC浓度及清除率的影响均远低于BUN、SCr,提示用其反映肾功能的变化相对更为可靠。 Objective:Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) can affect the serum concentrations of usually used biomarkers to indicate renal function, like urea ( BUN ), creatinine (SCr) and cystatin C ( CysC ). In this study we investigate to what extent CVVH affects the concentrations of BUN, SCr and CysC independent on renal function change. Methodology :Fifteen patients with oliguric acute AKI requiring CVVH were enrolled. Seven of them received CVVH in predilution mode at dose of 2 L/h and eight received CVVH in predilution mode at dose of 4 L/h. Samples were obtained from the afferent and efferent lines of the extracorporeal circuit and from the uhrafiltrate line at 4 different time points(O,4,12 and 24h) for measurement of BUN, SCr and CysC. Changes of serum levels of biomarkers over time, clearance of biomarkers and area under the curve(AUC) were analyzed. Results:Serum levels of BUN, SCr and CysC were gradually decreased at 4,12 and 24h during CVVH at dose of 2 L/h. Mean decreases of BUN at 4h, 12h,24h were 13. 7% ,43.0% and 49. 5% ; mean decreases of SCr were 12. 7% ,28. 1% and 54. 5% ; mean decreases of CysC were 8. 0% ,23.0% and 29. 3% ,respectively. Decreases of CysC at 24h were significantly less than the decreases of BUN and SCr (both P 〈 0. 05 ). Mean clearance of BUN,SCr and CysC were 23.0 ml/min, 26. 8 ml/min and 10. 4 ml/min, and AUC of BUN, SCr and CysC were 0. 306 mg/(L'h) ,0. 252 mg/(L'h) and 0. 190 mg/(L.h). Serum levels of BUN,SCr and CysC were gradually decreased at 4h,12h and 24h during CVVH at dose of 4 L/h. Mean decreases of BUN at 4h, 12h, 24h were 12. 3%, 33.4% and 56. 5% and 49. 5% ; mean decreases of SCr were lg. 5% ,29. 4% and 49.6% ; mean decreases of CysC werel0. 2% ,17.6% and 29. 7%, respectively. Decreases of CysC at 12h and 24h were significantly less than the decreases of BUN and Scr (both P 〈0. 05). Mean clearance of BUN,SCr and CysC were 46. 3 ml/min,41.8 ml/min and 21.7 ml/min ,and AUC of BUN,SCr and CysC were 0.271 mg/(L-h),0.216 mg/(L.h) and 0.310 mg/(L.h). Conclusion:The alteration of serum levels of Cys C during CVVH is comparable with BUN and SCr.
出处 《肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期21-25,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology,Dialysis & Transplantation
关键词 连续性肾脏替代治疗 连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过 急性肾损伤 胱抑素C continuous renal replacement therapy continuous veno-venous hemofiltration acute kidney injury cystatin C
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Waikar SS, Liu KD, Chertow GM. Diagnosis, epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2008,3 (3) : 844-861.
  • 2Block CA, Manning HL. Prevention of acute renal failure in the critically ill . Am J Respir Crit Care Med ,2002,165 (3) :320-324.
  • 3Wald R,Quinn RR, Luo J, et al. Chronic dialysis and death among survivors of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. JAMA, 2009,302 (11) :1179-1185.
  • 4Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Assessing kidney function- measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med, 2006,354 ( 23 ) : 2473-2483.
  • 5Damman K,van der Harst P,Smilde TD,et al. Use of cystatin C levels in estimating renal function and prognosis in patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Heart ,2012,98(4) :319-324.
  • 6Filler G, Bkenkamp A, Hofmann W, et al. Cystatin C as a marker of GFR-history,indications,and future research. CIin Biochem, 2005,38 (l) :1-8.
  • 7Herget-Rosenthal S, Marggraf G, Hiising J, et al. Early detection of acute renal failure by serum cystatin C. Kidney Int, 2004,66 (3): 1115-1122.
  • 8Mehta RL,Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) : Report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care,2007,11 (2) : R31.
  • 9Hoek FJ, Kemperman FA, Krediet RT. A comparison between eystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcrofi and Gauh formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant,2003, 18(10) :2024-2031.
  • 10Roos JF, Doust J, Tett SE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C compared to serum creatinine for the estimation of renal dysfunction in adults and children : a meta-analysis. Clin Biochem, 2007,40 ( 5-6 ) : 383-391.

同被引文献96

  • 1郑卫萍.肝硬化急性肾损伤患者的肾脏生物学标志物与鉴别诊断[J].实用器官移植电子杂志,2014,2(3). 被引量:6
  • 2王海燕.肾脏病学[M]第2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.103-104.
  • 3陈灏珠.实用内科学[M] .12版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006: 1948-1950.
  • 4Palevsky'PM, Zhang JH, O'Connor TZ, et al. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury [J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359 (1): 7-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802639.
  • 5International Society of Nephrology, Kidney International. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury [J]. Kidney Int, 2012,2 (1): 1-138.DOI: 10.1038/kisup.2012.1.
  • 6Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, et al. Discontinuation of continuous renal replacement therapy: a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study [J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37 (9): 2576-2582. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a38241.
  • 7Fr5hlich S, Donnelly A, Solymos O, et al. Use of 2-hour creatinine clearance to guide cessation of continuous renal replacement therapy [J]. J Crit Care, 2012, 27 (6): 744.el-5. DOI: 10.1016/jjcrc. 2012.08.012.
  • 8Wald R, Deshpande R, Bell CM, et al. Survival to discharge among patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy [J]. Hemodial Int, 2006, 10 (1): 82-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758. 2006.01179.x.
  • 9Wu VC, Ko WJ, Chang HW, et al. Risk factors of early redialysis after weaning from postoperative acute renal replacement therapy [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2008, 34 (1): 101-108. DOI: 10.1007/sOO134- 007-0813-x.
  • 10Ohnuma T, Suzuki J, Sanayama H, et al. Higher urine output in patients with acute kidney injury after discontinuation of continuous renal replacement therapy is associated with lower mortality and improved renal recovery [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39 Suppl 2: $201-539. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3095-5.

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部