期刊文献+

汕头市部分人群对公共场所全面禁烟的态度及其影响因素分析 被引量:5

Attitude of some population in Shantou City towards smoking bans in public places and associating factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究汕头市人群烟草危害认知情况,探讨公共场所全面禁烟的态度及影响因素,为汕头市制定控烟政策提供证据。方法采用目的抽样,从汕头市2个较大型汽车客运中心拦截500名候车乘客,利用统一问卷调查其人口学基本特征、吸烟与否、烟草危害认知、禁烟知晓及公共场所禁烟态度等。采用多因素二分类logistic回归分析影响调查对象对公共场所全面禁烟态度的因素。结果共调查502名候车乘客,男性占81.9%(411/502),女性占18.1%(91/502);年龄≤30岁为主,占60.6%(304/502)。88.5%(431/487)的调查对象认为吸烟对健康没有好处,73.2%(357/488)的对象知道吸烟会导致肺癌,认为吸烟会导致冠心病(19.5%,95/488)和中风(6.6%,32/488)的比例较低。69.0%(339/491)的对象认为吸二手烟会导致肺癌,而仅有22.4%(110/491)认为吸二手烟会导致冠心病。96.6%(475/502)的调查对象赞成在公共场所全面禁烟。仅有6.9%(31/447)完全知道法定的禁烟公共场所。48.7%(242/497)的调查对象认为立法可以有效地在公共场所全面禁烟,46.9%(233/497)选择了高罚款,39.8%(198/497)选择烟草危害宣传,29.2%(145/497)选择免费提供戒烟产品,26.2%(130/497)选择禁止烟草广告,18.9%(94/497)选择提高烟价。多因素回归分析表明,文化程度(OR=12.283)、吸烟危害认知(OR=5.267)、禁烟知晓(OR=0.357)是支持公共场所全面禁烟态度的影响因素。结论汕头市受调查人群公共场所全面禁烟支持率较高。文化程度、吸烟危害认知和禁烟知晓是影响公共场所全面禁烟态度的重要因素。应积极修订禁烟条例,加强烟草危害宣传,提供戒烟帮助,并据此出台能被广泛接受的有效控烟政策。 Objective To identify knowledge about adverse health effects of tobacco and to exam- ine the support for smoke-free policy in Shantou. Methods Waiting passengers in large-scale bus termi- nals were selected by purposive sampling method. Face-to-face questionnaire survey were conducted to ex- amine demographic information, cigarette smoking habit, knowledge about adverse health effects of smok- ing, awareness of smoking bans and support for smoke-free policy. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with the attitude towards smoking bans in public places. Results A total of 502 waiting passengers were surveyed. Among them, 81.9% (411/502) were male and 18. 1% (91/502) were female. 60.6% (304/502)were under 30 years old. 88.5% (431/487)knew that smoking was harmful to health. The proportion of respondents who knew that smoking could cause lung cancer was 73.2% (357/488), much higher than that of coronary heart disease ( 19. 5%, 95/488) and stroke (6. 6%, 32/488), respectively. 69. 0% (339/491) knew that secondhand smoke could cause lung cancer, while 22.4% ( 110/491 ) knew about coronary heart disease. 96. 6% (475/502) of the respond- ents agreed with the smoke bans in pubic places. However, only 6. 9% (31/447) knew about the policy for smoke-free places. 48.7% (242/497) believed that legislation could effectively ban smoking in public places. 46. 9% (233/497) selected severe fines and 39. 8% (198/497)selected tobacco harm education. 29. 2% (145/497) approved of providing free quit-smoking products. 26. 2% (130/497) selected bans on tobacco advertising and 18. 9% (94/497) selected raising taxes on tobacco. Multivariate logistic regres- sion analysis showed that education ( OR = 12. 283 ) , knowledge about health hazards of smoking ( OR = 5. 267 ) and awareness of smoking bans ( OR = 0. 357 ) were associated with support for on smoking bans in pubic places. Conclusion Respondents in Shantou were strongly supportive of smoking bans in public places. Support for smoke-free public settings is associated with education, knowledge about health hazards of smoking and awareness of smoking bans. Policy makers should proactively utilize this unique feature to implement effective and potentially well-accepted smoking ban program in Shantou.
出处 《华南预防医学》 2013年第2期22-27,共6页 South China Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 公共场所 禁烟 二手烟 知识 Public places Smoking bans Secondhand smoking Knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Tobacco Free Initiative. Why tobacco is a public health priority [ EB/OL]. [ 2010 - 12 - 15 ]. http://www, who. int./tobacco/ health_priority/en/index, html.
  • 2U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health con- sequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: A report of the surgeon general[ R ]. Atlanta, GA:U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health ,2006.
  • 3中国疾病预防控制中心.2010年全球成人烟草调查中国报告[R].北京:中国三峡出版社,2011.
  • 4杨功焕,胡鞍钢,王克安.期盼,从消极控烟国迈向积极控烟国[M].北京:中国新闻社,2011:1-22.
  • 5AU WW, SUDS ,YUAN J. Cigarette smoking in China: public health, science, and policy [ J ]. Rev Environ Health, 2012,27 (1) :43 -49.
  • 6WHO. Framework convention tobacco control [ DB/OL]. [2012 - 09 - 24 ]. http ://www. who. int/ fctc/text_download/en/in- dex. html.
  • 7李云霞,姜垣,杨焱,南奕,冯国泽,周刚,黎明,张楚南.中国公共场所禁止吸烟法规现状分析[J].环境与健康杂志,2007,24(4):221-223. 被引量:59
  • 8卢朝霞,李会艳.经济特区授权立法若干问题探讨[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,30(2):105-108. 被引量:8
  • 9Tobacco Free Initiative. A subset of key questions from the global adult tobacco survey(GATS) 2nd edition [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011 - 10 - 28 ]. http ://www. who. int/tobacco/publications/surveil- lance/tqs/en/index, html.
  • 10World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco ep- idemic,2008 : the MPOWER package [ R ]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.

二级参考文献18

  • 1李云霞,姜垣,杨焱,南奕,冯国泽,周刚,黎明,张楚南.中国公共场所禁止吸烟法规现状分析[J].环境与健康杂志,2007,24(4):221-223. 被引量:59
  • 2杨功焕,马杰民,刘娜,周灵妮.中国人群2002年吸烟和被动吸烟的现状调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(2):77-83. 被引量:1054
  • 3U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequenc.es of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General[R]. Washington DC, 2006.
  • 4World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: The MPOWER package[R]. Geneva, 2008.
  • 5Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review[J].BMJ, 2002, 325: 188.
  • 6Allwright S, Paul G, Greiner B, et al. Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study[J].BMJ, 2005, 331: 1117.
  • 7Fong GT, Hyland A, BorIand R, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey [J]. Tob Control, 2006, 15: 51-58.
  • 8Edwards R, Thomson G, Wilson N, et al. After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand[J].Tob Control, 2008, 17: e2.
  • 9Reduced secondhand smoke exposure after implementation of a compre hensive statewide smoking ban-New York, June 26, 2003-June 30, 2004[J].Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2007, 56: 705-708.
  • 10Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, et al. Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey[J]. Tob Control, 2006, 15: 34-41.

共引文献76

同被引文献42

  • 1李云霞,姜垣,杨焱,南奕,冯国泽,周刚,黎明,张楚南.中国公共场所禁止吸烟法规现状分析[J].环境与健康杂志,2007,24(4):221-223. 被引量:59
  • 2星一,季成叶,潘永平,籍红,张琳.北京市中学生使用烟草、酒精等成瘾性物质状况[J].中国学校卫生,2005,26(1):18-19. 被引量:56
  • 3杨功焕,马杰民,刘娜,周灵妮.中国人群2002年吸烟和被动吸烟的现状调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(2):77-83. 被引量:1054
  • 4王琼,魏咏兰,杜其筠,傅小鲁,贾勇,张文静,廖江.成都市青少年吸烟现况调查[J].现代预防医学,2005,32(9):1139-1140. 被引量:16
  • 5徐越,张新卫,郭俊香,张雪海,章珍珍,顾昉.浙江省初中学生尝试吸烟行为调查[J].浙江预防医学,2007,19(8):5-7. 被引量:24
  • 6卫生部履行《烟草控制框架公约》领导小组办公室.2007年中国控制吸烟报告[R].北京:卫生部,2007.
  • 7Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smok- ing and Health. How tobacco smoke causes disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease. A report of the surgeon general[R]. Atlanta (GA) : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2010.
  • 8Office for National Statistics.General Lifestyle Survey Overview:A report on the 2011General Lifestyle Survey.[R].Newport:Office for National Statistics,2013.
  • 9Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(US).Global Youth Tobacco Survey(GYTS)Core Questionnaire.[EB/OL].(2008-01-25)[2014-09-17].http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5701a3.html.
  • 10中国疾病预防控制中心控烟办公室.创建全面无烟校园指南[EB/OL].(2012-11-28)[2014-09-17].http://www.tcrc.org.cn/html/zy/cbw/bh/1619.html.

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部