期刊文献+

轨道交通拥挤线路票价及服务供应优化模型(英文) 被引量:1

Modeling Optimal Fare and Service Provisions for a Crowded Rail Transit Line
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为缓解日益严重的交通拥堵及其带来的环境问题,中国很多城市开始发展轨道交通系统.但是轨道交通能否达到预期的分担率还取决于其相对于路面交通方式是否具有明显的优势.有效的运行管理系统不仅有利于轨道交通的建设与发展,也有利于提升整个城市交通系统的运行效率.针对拥挤线路,在一定的管理目标约束下,本文建立了票价、发车频率和车厢数的优化模型.模型还考虑了负外部性的噪声污染因素、车内拥挤度的反作用以及正外部性的缓解道路拥挤因素.选取苏州市为例,详细说明了某运输通道下轨道交通线路定价的有效性和服务供应的合理性的评价方法.理论与实例综合分析表明,与经济效益最大化相比,社会效益最大化的需求为低票价、多车厢数和高载客率.从现行的运行管理模式向社会效益最优转化需要降低票价、增大发车频次并增加车厢数. To relieve worsening traffic congestion and protect the deteriorating environment, many cities in China start to operate rail transit lines. However, the expected modal shift will only occur if the rail transit system offers great advantages over road transport modes. To this end, designing efficient operational arrangement has far-reaching impacts not only on rail transit itself, but also on the overall urban transport system. Focusing on a crowded rail transit line, this paper aims to jointly optimize fare, frequency and number of carriages under advocated management objectives. Factors that enter into this joint optimization include negative externality arising from noise pollution, the adverse effect from in-vehicle crowding and positive externality from road congestion relief. To assess whether the rail transit line in a given corridor is priced efficiently and the service provision is appropriate, detailed numerical calculations are carried out for one representative Chinese city--Suzhou. A synthesis of theoretical and empirical analyses depicts: compared with profit optima, social welfare oPtima are characterized with lower fares, greater frequency, more number of carriages and higher ridership ; the change from the current operational arrangement to social optimum would call for reducing fares, increasing frequency and adopting more carriages.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期69-80,共12页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 substantially supported by the Ministry of Education(MOE) of Humanities Social Sciences Project of China(No.12YJA630097)
关键词 城市交通 服务供应优化 分析优化建模 轨道交通服务 车内拥挤成本函数 urban traffic optimal service provisions analytical optimization modeling rail transit services in-vehicle crowding cost functions
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1van de Velde D. Organizational forms and entrepreneurship in public transport: part 1: classifying organizational forms[J. Transport Policy, 1999, 6: 147-157.
  • 2Vickrey W. Pricing in urban and suburban transport [ J . American Economic Review, 1963, 53: 452-465.
  • 3Mohring H. Optimization and scale economies in urban bus transportation [ Jl. American Economic Review, 1972, 62: 591-604.
  • 4Turvey R, Mohring H. Optimal bus fares[J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1975, 9: 280-286.
  • 5Jansson J O. Marginal cost pricing of scheduled transport services [ J ]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1979, 13: 268-294.
  • 6Jansson J O. A simple bus line model for optimization of frequency and bus size [ J ]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1980, 14: 53-80.
  • 7Viton P A. Pareto-optimal urban transportation equilibria [J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 1983, 1: 75-101.
  • 8Chang S K, Schonfeld P M. Multiple period optimization of bus transit system [ J ]. Transportation Research Part B, 1991, 25(6) : 453-478.
  • 9Jara-Diaz S R, Gschwender A. Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport [ J 1. Transport Reviews, 2003, 23 ( 4 ) : 453 -469.
  • 10Small K A. Road pricing and public transport [ C 1. In: Santos G, (Ed.), Road Pricing: Theory and Evidence, Elsevier, Oxford, 2004, 133-158.

同被引文献10

  • 1李丽群,陈龙.基于效用理论的城市轨道交通运营管理优化策略[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2012,31(2):289-292. 被引量:8
  • 2矫丽丽,徐永能,于世军.城市轨道交通乘客满意度测评模型[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2012,31(z1):638-640. 被引量:21
  • 3MALLIKARJUN S, LEWIS H F, SEXTON T R. Operational per- formance of U. S. public rail transit and implications for public poli- cy[ J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2014,48 ( 1 ) :74-88.
  • 4HURST N B, WEST S E. Public transit and urban redevelopment: The effect of light rail transit on land use in Minneapolis, Minnesota [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics ,2014,46 (5) :57-72.
  • 5WANG Q,LIU Z G,HE Y L,et al. Research of urban rail transit passengers' evaluation index on the large-scale events-take Shang- hai F1 formula as an example[ J]. International Journal of Business awl Social Science ,2014,5 ( 3 ) : 197-202.
  • 6WANG Y H, LI M, YANG B, et al. An urban rail transit hazard e- valuation methodology based on grey system theory [ C l//The 8th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies. Changsha : [ s. n. ] ,2012:764-772.
  • 7SAMANTA S, JHA M K. Modeling a rail transit alignment consider- ing different objectives [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice ,2011,45 ( 1 ) :31-45.
  • 8郭琴,王元庆.公共自行车与轨道交通换乘效率评价指标体系[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2014,12(1):11-16. 被引量:5
  • 9徐磊,彭金栓,邵毅明.基于DHGF模型的旧机动车评估方法[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2014,33(6):167-170. 被引量:3
  • 10方蕾,邹哲,庞志显.城市轨道交通服务质量模糊综合评判[J].城市,2004(1):28-30. 被引量:12

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部