期刊文献+

桐城派与嘉道之际的学术格局 被引量:1

The Tongcheng School and the Academic Pattern in the Jiaqing and Daoguang Periods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 嘉道时期,汉学与宋学的对峙日益走向公开化,"汉宋之争"也随之达到高潮。在这场论辩中,学宗程朱的桐城派全面系统地批判汉学弊病,辩护宋学道统地位,维护程朱形象,并在论争高潮后立足宋学,从经世致用角度出发兼采汉学,逐渐改善了宋学处境,促使嘉道学术格局向有利于宋学的方向转变,为宋学的复兴奠定了基石。 In the Jiaqing and Daoguang periods, the controversy between Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism became obvious, and gradually reached a climax. In this debate, enshrining Neo-Confucianism actively, the Tongcheng School criticized the drawbacks of traditional Confucianism comprehensively and systematically, enhanced the Neo-Confueianism' s orthodox status, maintained the images of the Cheng-Zhu school, and absorbed the advantage of traditional Confucianism from the perspective of statecraft in the late period, thus gradually improving the position of Neo-Confucianism and reversing the academia structure, the development of which was beneficial to Neo-Confucianism and fundamental to its revival.
作者 褚宏霞
出处 《安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第2期6-11,共6页 Journal of Anqing Teachers College(Social Science Edition)
基金 山东省社科规划项目"清代理学与清朝政治"(06JDB103)
关键词 桐城派 汉宋之争 学术格局 tbe Tongcheng School controversy between Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism academic pattern
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1惠栋.松崖文钞:卷一[M]//续修四库全书:第1427册[M].上海古籍出版社,2002:270.
  • 2章太炎.旭书·清儒[M]//章太炎全集(三).上海人民出版社,1984:155.
  • 3曾国藩.曾国藩全集·诗文[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1986.
  • 4钱大听.潜研堂文集[M]//续修四库全书:第1438册.上海古籍出版社,2002:658.
  • 5吴德旋.初月楼文钞[M]//丛书集成续编:第158册.台北:新文丰出版社,1989:426.
  • 6东方树.考架集文录[M]//续修四库全书:第1497册.上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 7戴钧衡.味经山馆文钞[M]//续修四库全书:第1545册.上海古籍出版社,2002:581.
  • 8方东树.汉学商兑[M].《续修四库全书》第951册.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 9方东树.仪卫轩文集[M].同治七年刻本.
  • 10秦瀛.小砚山人文集[M]//续修四库全书:第1465册.上海古籍出版社,2002:124.

共引文献10

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部