摘要
根据Yus的基本认知框架研究反讽如何被识别和理解,分析美国总统辩论语篇中言语反讽的特点。发现与其他语境信息相比,听者识别反讽时,言者个人背景和百科知识这两种语境信息经常作为判断反讽的主导语境信息,而语言暗示和非语言行为经常作为辅助语境信息。
This paper investigates the recognition and interpretation of verbal irony in Aanerican presidential debates with a cognitive pragmatic approach. It shows that compared to other contextual sources, biographical data, encyclopedic knowledge are frequently activated as leading contextual information. By contrast, Linguistic cues and nonverbal behavior normally serve as supportive contextual sources.
出处
《保定学院学报》
2013年第2期121-124,共4页
Journal of Baoding University
关键词
言语反讽
美国总统辩论
语境信息
主导语境
辅助语境
verbal irony
American presidential debates
contextual sources
leading source
supportive source
