摘要
根据驱动模式的不同可将生产者服务业划分为成本驱动型和差异化驱动型,并在区间霍特林模型基础上分别探讨两种驱动模式下生产者服务业与制造业之间的互动关系,旨在揭示相对于成本驱动型、差异化驱动型与制造业之间更容易形成良好的互动关系。在理论分析的基础上,利用中国1999-2010年的分省面板数据,对不同驱动模式的生产者服务业与制造业的互动关系进行实证检验。实证结果表明:成本驱动型生产者服务业虽有效推动了经济增长,但与制造业的互动关系却不理想;差异化驱动型生产者服务业与制造业的互动关系虽然良好,但其对经济增长的推动作用却并没有有效发挥。因此制造业的产业升级有赖于差异化驱动型生产者服务业的进一步发展,需要在人力资本、高端制造业、制度环境等方面进一步推进和优化。
The producer service can be classified into cost--driving producer service and differ- entiation--driving producer service according to different driven modes. The interactive relationship between producer service under the foresaid two driven modes and manufacturing industry was ex- plored respectively by conducting interval Hotelling model. The result of this study reveals that, comparing to cost--driving producer service, it is easier for the differentiation--driving producer service to build a good interactive relationship with manufacturing industry. Besides, based on this theoretical analysis, the interaction of producer service in different driven modes and manufacturing industry was verified by using China's province level panel data from 1990 to 2010. The empirical result indicates that, although the cost--driving producer service could promote economic growth effectively, the interactive relationship between it and manufacturing industry is unsatisfactory, while the differentiation--driving producer service has a good interaction with manufacturing industry, but it could not promote economic growth effectively. Thus, it is pointed out that the industrial upgrading of manufacturing industry depends on the further development of the differentiation-- driving producer service, and some suggestions on the development of differentiation--driving pro- ducer service was put forward.
出处
《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期121-129,共9页
Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
关键词
成本驱动型
差异化驱动型
生产者服务业
区间霍特林模型
Cost -- driving
Differentiation-- driving
Producer Service
the Interval Hotelling Differentiation Model.