期刊文献+

广州市越秀区重性精神病肇事肇祸倾向者社区干预模式研究 被引量:5

Study on the Model of Community Intervention on the Patients with Severe Psychosis Who Have Tendency of Making Trouble,Yuexiu District,Guangzhou City
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探索和建立有重性精神病肇事肇祸倾向者社区干预模式,以便降低疾病复发,减少疾病负担,降低肇事肇祸危险。[方法]2010~2012年,在广州市越秀区5条行政街确诊为精神分裂症、心境障碍、分裂情感性精神病、偏执性精神障碍患者中抽取有肇事肇祸危险倾向的1~5级患者139例进行社区干预,并在干预前、接受干预2年时分别使用肇事肇祸危险度评估表、生活质量量表、简明精神病量表、社会功能缺陷筛选量表(SDSS)和Zarit护理者负担量表进行调查与评价。[结果]干预2年时与干预前比较,139例患者的暴力行为等级下降(P<0.05),简明精神病量表评分别为45.19±17.77、31.55±11.67分(P<0.01),社会功能缺陷筛选量表评分为24.01±14.83、18.93±12.83分(P<0.01),Zarit护理者负担量表评分为48.69±13.86、45.56±15.18分(P<0.05),生活质量量表评分为18.84±2.54、18.60±2.50分(P>0.05)。[结论]对重性精神病患者的社区干预措施的效果是显著的。 [Objective]To explore and establish severe psychotic community intervention model, who have the tendency of troublemaking,in order to ease the burden of disease, reduce the mental disease relapse rate and the risk of troublemaking. [Methods] The patients of the schizophrenia,mood disorder, schizoaffective psychosis and paranoid disorder (rough stuff grading standards 1-5 levels) from five streets in Yuexiu district were selected as the objects of study,and the community intervention was implemented for two Years. The patients were investigated and evaluated with scales before being intervened and over 2 years, which were evaluative troublemaking scale, the changing values of quality of life scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Social Disability Screening Schedule and the score of Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview. [Results]Compared to the previous, the violence level in patients significantly decreased after two years intervention( P 〈 0.05). The score of The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale decreased from. 45.19 ± 17.77 points to 31.55 ± 11.67 points( P 〈0.05). The score of Social Disability Screening Schedule decreased from 24.01± 14.83 points to 18.93± 12.83 points( P 〈0.05). The score of Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview decreased from 48.69 ± 13.86 points to 45.56± 15.18 points ( P 〈0.05). The score of Quality of Life Scale was 18.84±2.54 and 18.60± 2.50( P 〉0. 05). [Conclusion]The effect of the severe psychotic community intervention is significant.
出处 《预防医学论坛》 2013年第4期249-251,254,共4页 Preventive Medicine Tribune
基金 广州市越秀区科技计划项目(2010-ws-019)
关键词 重性精神病 肇事肇祸 社区综合干预 Severe psychotic Troublemaking Community integrated intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献22

  • 1李凌江,张亚林,杨德森,郝伟,肖水源,李振国,廖巨福,吴舸,罗友根,黄俊,张斌,刘解宁.社区人群生活质量研究──Ⅱ方法学及社区人群的总体生活质量[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(4):186-190. 被引量:219
  • 2徐燕.浅谈精神病人的家庭管理[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(B09):65-65. 被引量:6
  • 3沈渔屯,主编.精神病学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:95-104,426-429,958.
  • 4卫生部疾病预防控制局.精神卫生政策研究报告汇编.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
  • 5中华医学会,精神科学分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].3版.山东:山东科学技术出版社,2001:23.
  • 6Baugartez M,Hanley J A.Infante-Rivard I.Health of family members caring for elderly persons with dementia:a longitudinal study[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,1994,120:126-132.
  • 7Arai Y,Ikegami N.Health care systems in transition:an overview of Japanese health care[J].Journal of Public Health Medicine,1998,20(1):29-33.
  • 8Gort AM,Mazarico S,Balleste J,et al.Use of Zarit scale for assessmentof caregiver burden in palliative care[J].Med Clin,2003,121(4):132-133.
  • 9Chichester,John Wiley,Baumgarten M.The health of persons giving care to the elderly:acritical review of the literature[J].Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,1989,42:1137-1148.
  • 10张广歧.211例精神分裂症复发情况的随访研究[J].神经精神疾病杂志,1980,6(3):161-162.

共引文献1055

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部